California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2573

Introduced
2/14/24  
Introduced
2/14/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Engrossed
5/13/24  
Refer
5/13/24  
Refer
5/13/24  
Refer
6/12/24  
Refer
6/12/24  
Report Pass
6/20/24  
Report Pass
6/20/24  
Refer
6/20/24  
Refer
6/20/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Enrolled
8/19/24  
Enrolled
8/19/24  
Chaptered
9/14/24  
Chaptered
9/14/24  
Passed
9/14/24  

Caption

Policy fellows: status of services: associations.

Impact

By formalizing the status of policy fellows provided by specific associations, AB 2573 seeks to enhance the state’s governance framework. The bill establishes that these fellows shall not be treated as employees within the state civil service system, nor shall they be regarded as gifts or compensations under existing political ethics laws. This legislative infrastructure aims to promote the effective use of policy fellows while ensuring that ethics compliance remains intact and potential conflicts of interest are minimized.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2573, introduced by Mike Fong, focuses on defining the status and regulatory scope of policy fellows provided by various nonprofit organizations within California. The bill aims to clarify that the services of these policy fellows, specifically those from associations exempt from federal taxation under Section 501(c)(3), are not considered compensation, gifts, or professional obligations that could create conflicts of interest for members of the Legislature or state officials. Current regulations regarding campaign financing and ethics concerning public officials are reinforced to ensure transparency and accountability in governmental practices.

Sentiment

Supporters of the bill generally view it as a positive step towards improving the legislative process and ensuring that policy fellows can effectively contribute to government operations without the burdens of potential legal landmines. The response from critics, however, suggests some concern over the implications of such policy adjustments, primarily concerning the lack of oversight on the contributions and influences these fellows might exert within legislative functions.

Contention

While proponents claim that the bill simply codifies existing practices, critics express unease regarding transparency and oversight. The explicit exemption from civil service regulations raises questions about accountability and whether this could lead to undue influence from non-profit organizations within legislative processes. The debates around AB 2573 reflect broader discussions about governance, the role of non-profits in politics, and the importance of maintaining ethical standards among public officials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB698

California Council on Science and Technology Policy Fellows: status of services.

CA AB1620

Political Reform Act of 1974: postgovernment employment.

CA AB931

State Bar Act: consumer legal funding.

CA SB1149

Civil actions: agreements settling actions involving public health or safety.

CA AB61

State Compensation Insurance Fund: board.

CA AB1663

Protective proceedings.

CA AB1328

Oil and gas: water quality.

CA AB3279

State Bar of California.