California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB52

Introduced
12/5/22  
Refer
3/16/23  
Introduced
12/5/22  
Introduced
12/5/22  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Vetoed
9/20/24  

Caption

Income tax credit: sales and use taxes paid: manufacturing equipment: research and development equipment.

Impact

The legislation aims to amend the existing Revenue and Taxation Code by incorporating incentives designed to attract and retain manufacturing businesses and encourage research and development investment. The tax credits will be accessible to those engaging in activities deemed essential to the state's economic health, addressing concerns over high operational costs due to elevated sales tax burdens. It is expected to foster a more competitive climate for businesses operating in California, particularly as many have been relocating or expanding to more cost-effective jurisdictions.

Summary

Assembly Bill 52, introduced by Assembly Member Grayson, establishes a tax credit intended to promote investment in manufacturing and research and development activities in California. The bill specifically offers taxpayers a credit against their net tax for the amount of sales and use taxes they have paid related to qualified tangible personal property used in these sectors from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2030. This is in response to California's relatively high sales tax rates compared to other states, which can discourage business retention and growth within the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 52 seems optimistic among supporters, particularly from the manufacturing and technology sectors, who see this legislation as a vital step in fostering economic development. Legislative supporters argue that this tax break could rejuvenate California's manufacturing capability, which has been on the decline due to high operating costs. However, some critics express concern that the bill may further complicate California's tax system and worry about the implications of revenue loss due to granted credits.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns over the potential fiscal impact of the tax credits. Critics point out that allowing these exemptions may significantly decrease revenue for public services funded by sales taxes. Additionally, discussions emphasize the need for rigorous oversight and evaluation metrics to ensure that the program truly leads to the desired economic outcomes. The bill mandates the Department of Finance to provide annual estimations of potential revenue losses due to the implementation of these credits, highlighting the ongoing debate regarding balancing state revenue and incentivizing business.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB587

Personal income taxes: credit: manufacturing: sales and use taxes.

CA AB113

Income taxes: credits: electric vehicles.

CA AB1873

Personal Income Tax Law: Corporation Tax Law: credits: electric vehicle charging stations.

CA AB856

Sales and Use Tax: exemptions: manufacturing.

CA SB116

Budget Act of 2017.

CA AB1716

Income taxes: credit: jobs and investment.

CA AB1951

Sales and use tax: exemptions: manufacturing.

CA AB131

Taxation.