The implementation of AB 936 is expected to enhance the ability of dental students to provide care to underserved populations during sponsored events, thereby increasing access to dental services. It aims to address barriers to dental care by encouraging more frequent participation of dental students in community service efforts, particularly in free dental clinics. Moreover, by providing practical training opportunities to students, the bill also seeks to alleviate workforce shortages in the dental industry, which have become increasingly pressing in recent years.
Assembly Bill 936 is a legislative measure aimed at amending Section 1626.6 of the Business and Professions Code, focusing specifically on the practice of dentistry by dental students. The bill allows dental students, defined as individuals who have commenced clinical training at an accredited dental school, to perform dental procedures at community-sponsored events under specific conditions. This would include practicing without compensation or expectation of payment, all while being supervised by a licensed dentist with a clinical faculty appointment. The bill emphasizes the need for adequate patient care assessments and ensures that students only perform procedures they are credentialed for under careful oversight.
The general sentiment surrounding AB 936 is largely positive, with support from both the dental educational community and healthcare advocates who recognize the urgent need for improved access to dental care in underprivileged areas. Proponents argue that the bill not only provides vital services but also fosters a sense of civic responsibility among dental students. Nonetheless, some concerns have been raised regarding the adequacy of supervision and the potential risks associated with less experienced students performing dental procedures, even under supervision.
Key points of contention regarding this bill relate to the balance between providing hands-on training opportunities to dental students and ensuring patient safety. Critics worry that allowing students to perform procedures, even with supervision, might compromise the quality of care patients receive, particularly if the supervision levels are inadequate. Furthermore, there is an emphasis on the necessity for comprehensive informed consent processes, ensuring that patients are fully aware they might be treated by students. Addressing these concerns will be crucial for the effective rollout of the proposed legislation.