California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1288

Introduced
2/15/24  
Introduced
2/15/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/24/24  
Engrossed
5/24/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Chaptered
9/28/24  
Chaptered
9/28/24  
Passed
9/28/24  

Caption

Public schools: artificial intelligence working group.

Impact

The bill specifically empowers the working group to create comprehensive guidance for local educational agencies and charter schools by January 1, 2026, covering topics such as acceptable AI use, academic integrity, data privacy, and the impact of AI on teaching and learning. Furthermore, the group is tasked with devising a model policy to standardize approaches towards AI implementation in schools, ensuring these technologies support rather than replace educators. By setting this framework, the legislation aims to actively shape how AI is incorporated into classrooms, balancing innovation with necessary safeguards.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 1288, authored by Senator Becker, addresses the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) within public schools in California. The legislation mandates the establishment of a working group convened by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, aimed at developing guidelines for the effective and safe use of AI technologies in educational settings. This initiative arises from the legislative recognition of the increasing role of AI in education and the necessity for robust policies that ensure its ethical application does not undermine educational integrity or student well-being.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1288 is largely positive among educational professionals and policymakers who value the thoughtful integration of technology in learning environments. Advocates argue that the bill represents a crucial step in ensuring that AI enhances educational outcomes rather than detracts from them. However, there are underlying concerns about the potential for AI to exacerbate inequities in education, particularly regarding data security and the potential displacement of educators. Hence, while the bill is a progressive move towards embracing AI in education, it also reflects the apprehension surrounding rapid technological advancements in sensitive areas like education.

Contention

Overall, SB 1288 encapsulates a commitment to preparing California's education system for the challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence. There is contention regarding the balance between leveraging AI to support educational practices and the necessity of maintaining human oversight and involvement in teaching. Critics fear that unchecked integration of AI might prioritize convenience over critical educational values, necessitating careful monitoring of its deployment to ensure it aligns with the core goals of enhancing student learning and equity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2652

State Department of Education: artificial intelligence working group.

NV SB199

Enacts provisions relating to artificial intelligence systems. (BDR 52-583)

CA SB896

Generative Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act.

CA SB1235

Public postsecondary education: Artificial Intelligence and Deepfake Working Group.

TX HB1709

Relating to the regulation and reporting on the use of artificial intelligence systems by certain business entities and state agencies; providing civil penalties.

KY SB52

AN ACT relating to technology in education and declaring an emergency.

IL HB2503

SCH CD-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

MS SB2059

Artificial Intelligence in Education Task Force Act; enact.