California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2652

Introduced
2/14/24  
Introduced
2/14/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Refer
4/22/24  
Refer
4/22/24  
Refer
5/8/24  

Caption

State Department of Education: artificial intelligence working group.

Impact

The establishment of this working group is significant for the revision of educational practices in California. It will address critical aspects such as academic integrity, data privacy, and the role of AI technologies in teaching. Members of the working group will include educators, administrators, and industry representatives, ensuring a comprehensive overview of AI's implications within education. The group is expected to conduct public meetings to gather feedback from stakeholders, including students and families, to formulate effective policies that can be implemented statewide.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2652, introduced by Assembly Member Muratsuchi, aims to establish a working group focused on the safe and effective use of artificial intelligence (AI) in public education. The bill responds to the pressing need for state-level guidance and local policies regarding AI's application in schools. The working group will be tasked with developing guidance for local educational agencies and charter schools to ensure that AI tools are employed in ways that safeguard students and educators, while also maximizing educational benefits.

Sentiment

There's a notable positive sentiment surrounding AB 2652, particularly from educational professionals who recognize the necessity of clear guidelines and ethical standards as AI technology becomes more integrated into learning environments. However, there is also cautious skepticism from some stakeholders about the potential risks of AI, such as threats to privacy and the need for adequate training and resources to prevent misuse. The sentiment reflects a balancing act between innovation and preservation of student and educator rights.

Contention

Despite the optimistic outlook, AB 2652 may face contention regarding the extent of regulation it proposes. Some critics worry that overly stringent guidelines could stifle innovation and limit the potential benefits of AI in enhancing educational methods. Additionally, debates may arise over funding and the appropriations necessary for implementing the bill's provisions effectively. The bill requires a commitment from the legislature for appropriations, indicating an intersection of policy and fiscal responsibility that could influence its progression.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1288

Public schools: artificial intelligence working group.

CA SB896

Generative Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act.

MS SB2059

Artificial Intelligence in Education Task Force Act; enact.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

NJ A4400

Establishes NJ Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council.

VA HB2046

High-risk artificial intelligence; development, deployment, and use by public bodies, report.