California Senate Bill SB23

California 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/5/22
• Refer: 1/18/23
• Refer: 2/9/23
• Refer: 2/22/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Report Pass: 4/11/23
• Refer: 4/12/23
• Report Pass: 4/27/23
• Refer: 5/1/23
• Failed: 2/1/24

Caption

Water supply and flood risk reduction projects: expedited permitting.

Impact

The proposed legislation has a significant impact on state laws regarding environmental procedures, specifically the Port-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and the permitting processes associated with water-related projects. It aims to streamline existing regulations to enable quicker project initiation without compromising environmental safeguarding measures. The bill directs state agencies to develop an integrated regulatory approach, fostering collaboration with project proponents and various federal agencies to align permitting processes more effectively while maintaining necessary environmental protections.

Summary

Senate Bill 23, introduced by Senator Caballero, seeks to expedite the permitting process for water supply and flood risk reduction projects in California. The bill imposes specific reporting requirements on the state board and regional boards related to these projects, mandating that they provide annual updates that include information on project certifications and compliance with environmental reviews. By establishing structured timelines for reviews, the bill aims to make it easier for public agencies and utilities to implement projects aimed at improving water management and addressing flood risks, with a particular focus on the effects of climate change and environmental protection.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 23 appears to be positive among those who prioritize infrastructure improvements and environmental adaptation strategies in the face of climate change. Proponents argue that expediting permits is crucial for enhancing community resilience and improving water resource management. However, potential concerns exist regarding the balance between expedited processes and environmental stewardship, with some stakeholders wary that such measures might weaken protections previously implemented through more rigorous review processes.

Contention

Key points of contention involve the potential for diminished environmental oversight and the adequacy of existing conservation plans. Critics argue that hastening the permitting procedure could lead to negative consequences on aquatic ecosystems and wildlife, especially if safeguards are perceived as weakened. Furthermore, there is a call for clearer definitions within the bill to ensure that project plans adequately encompass environmental protections and that any expedited processes do not inadvertently bypass evaluations that ensure public and ecological safety.