California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB561

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

Public contracts: environmentally preferable purchasing.

Impact

The passage of SB 561 would further institutionalize environmentally conscious procurement practices within the state's public sector. By mandating that agencies factor in sustainability considerations, this bill could influence the types of products and services offered in the market, potentially leading to greater availability of eco-friendly alternatives. The emphasis on sustainability in procurement is expected to encourage suppliers to adapt and innovate, making environmentally preferable products more accessible and appealing to public agencies. Furthermore, this legislative change aligns with California's broader goals of reducing environmental harm and promoting sustainable development.

Summary

Senate Bill 561, introduced by Senator Blakespear, focuses on the concept of environmentally preferable purchasing in the context of public contracts. The bill seeks to amend Section 12400 of the Public Contract Code to refine the definition of environmentally preferable purchasing. This amendment aims to enhance the framework within which state agencies make procurement decisions regarding goods and services that have lesser environmental impacts compared to their counterparts. The legislation underlines the importance of considering a product's entire lifecycle, from raw material acquisition to disposal, thereby emphasizing a comprehensive approach to environmental responsibility in public purchasing.

Contention

While SB 561 predominantly presents a technical amendment, discussions surrounding its implications suggest that there are nuances regarding the careful definition and implementation of environmentally preferable purchasing standards. Some stakeholders may express concern about the potential for subjective interpretations of what constitutes 'environmentally preferable.' This ambiguity could lead to disputes about compliance and enforcement, particularly among suppliers vying for public contracts. The bill also raises questions about the balance between cost-effectiveness and environmental conscious purchasing, an ongoing debate in public procurement practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1579

Vehicles: batteries.

CA AB1476

Park property: City of Modesto: Beard Brook Park.

CA SB475

Park property: City of Laguna Woods: City Centre Park.

CA SB147

High-Speed Rail Authority.

CA SB1172

High-Speed Rail Authority: property acquisition: capital outlays: public contracts: county assessor’s records.

CA SB400

Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account: University of California: California State University: reports.

CA AB406

Agriculture: Healthy Soils Program: organic production.

CA AB1833

San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board: North County Transit District: consolidated agency: public contracting.