California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB660

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

Public employees’ retirement systems: California Public Retirement System Agency Cost and Liability Panel.

Impact

The establishment of this panel signals a strategic effort by the California Legislature to gain a clearer understanding of the financial implications surrounding public employee retirement systems. The panel will help ensure that participating employers are informed about how various factors, such as employee transfers and concurrent retirements across different systems, affect their pension liabilities. By requiring the panel to submit comprehensive reports to the legislature by the end of 2024, the bill aims to bridge gaps in knowledge and provide a framework for managing the complexities inherent in public retirement systems.

Summary

Senate Bill 660, introduced by Senator Alvarado-Gil, aims to amend the Government Code to establish the California Public Retirement System Agency Cost and Liability Panel. This panel will be responsible for providing impartial information regarding the financial impacts that public agencies face when employees transfer between different public agencies within the same retirement system or under reciprocal retirement systems. It will also assess how these changes affect overall pension costs and unfunded liabilities, a significant concern for many public employees and employers operating within these systems.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards SB 660 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with supporters recognizing the importance of transparency and accountability in managing public employees' retirement benefits. However, there are underlying concerns regarding the sufficiency of the panel's advisory role, particularly its nonbinding nature. While stakeholders acknowledge the necessity of studying pension costs and liabilities, questions remain about the actionable outcomes of the panel's reports and the real measures that will follow to address any identified issues.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the panel's advisory role, which some critics argue may not sufficiently empower the legislature to enact necessary reforms based on the panel's findings. Additionally, the bill's potential impact on unfunded liabilities within participating agencies raises concerns among public agencies that may face increased pressures to balance their budgets while providing adequate retirement benefits. With public scrutiny on pension systems continuing to grow, the efficacy and transparent operation of this newly established panel will be closely watched.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2658

Secretary of the Government Operations Agency: working group: blockchain technology.

CA AB378

Public officials.

CA AB2053

The Social Housing Act.

CA AB309

The Social Housing Act.

CA AB2470

Invasive Species Council of California.

CA AB2881

The Social Housing Act.

CA AB11

The Social Housing Act.

CA AB111

State government.