California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB678

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Engrossed
5/11/23  
Engrossed
5/11/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Report Pass
6/12/23  
Report Pass
6/12/23  
Refer
6/13/23  
Refer
6/13/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Enrolled
8/17/23  
Enrolled
8/17/23  
Chaptered
9/1/23  
Chaptered
9/1/23  
Passed
9/1/23  

Caption

Elections: disclosures.

Impact

This enhancement to the Political Reform Act of 1974 represents a significant effort to adapt existing election laws to the modern digital landscape. By requiring disclaimers for paid political posts, the bill aims to inform the public about the sources of political messaging, thereby helping voters understand the financial influences behind such content. Additionally, while this bill does not impose administrative penalties for non-compliance, it does empower the Commission to seek injunctive relief to enforce disclosures, which adds a layer of accountability.

Summary

Senate Bill 678, introduced by Senator Umberg, amends the Government Code to enhance disclosure requirements related to political advertisements on digital platforms. Specifically, it mandates that any individual compensated by a political committee to post supportive or opposing content about a candidate or ballot measure must include a disclaimer stating they were paid for the post. This requirement aims to improve transparency in political advertising, particularly as more campaigns utilize social media and digital applications for outreach and influence.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 678 appears to be largely positive among proponents of transparency and fair political practices. The push for clearer disclosure mechanisms reflects growing concerns about the influence of undisclosed spending on elections and the integrity of democratic processes. However, there may be some contention from groups who argue that additional regulations could complicate legitimate political expression and outreach efforts on digital platforms.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the balance between regulation and freedom of expression. Critics may argue that the requirement to publicly disclose compensation could deter individuals from participating in political discourse on social media. Moreover, exemptions for content posted by employees of committees raise questions about the consistency of enforcement and the potential for loopholes in the legislation. Overall, while the bill seeks to enhance transparency, it also underscores the complexity of regulating political advertising in the digital age.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2188

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures: advertisements.

CA AB2155

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.

IN HB1228

Fabricated media.

CA AB1148

Workers’ compensation insurance reporting.

CA SB579

Fish: Annual Provisional Stocking Document.

CT HB05528

An Act Concerning Changes To The Public Financing Act And Other Election Laws.

CA AB2916

Contractors: disclosure of letters of admonishment.

CA SB44

Brain-computer interfaces: neural data.