California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1488

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  

Caption

Self-defense.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1488 would amend existing laws in the Civil Code and Penal Code, particularly Section 50 of the Civil Code and Sections 692 and 693 of the Penal Code. Notably, it would eliminate civil liability for individuals who lawfully resist a public offense, thereby providing broader protections for those acting in self-defense. The implications suggest a significant shift in how self-defense cases may be evaluated in court, potentially encouraging individuals to act decisively without fear of later legal repercussions for their actions.

Summary

AB 1488, known as the Preemptive Self Defense Act of 2025, seeks to clarify and reform laws surrounding self-defense in California. The bill allows individuals who reasonably perceive an imminent threat of bodily harm to use proportional force to resist such threats. This sits alongside existing laws that authorize individuals to protect themselves and their family from wrongful harm. In particular, it aims to remove considerations of a person's background, training, or fighting skills when determining whether their defensive actions were reasonable in a self-defense context.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1488 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the amendments offer clearer guidance for lawful self-defense and promote personal safety by empowering individuals to act when threatened. Opponents may view the bill with caution, expressing concern over possible abuses of the self-defense claim and the potential for increased violence under the guise of lawful resistance.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding the bill include the balance between personal safety and the potential for misuse of self-defense claims. Critics may argue that the language of the bill is too broad, leading to situations where individuals might overextend their use of force in ambiguous circumstances. Conversely, advocates suggest that clear protections are necessary for individuals facing genuine threats. The debate exemplifies the ongoing tension between the need for public safety and the rights of individuals to defend themselves.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB106

Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry the handgun; providing penalties.

TX HB291

Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry the handgun; providing penalties.

TX HB922

Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry the handgun; creating an offense; providing penalties.

TX HB415

Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry the handgun; providing penalties.

MI SB1086

Consumer protection: other; no sell list for firearms; create. Amends secs. 1 & 2 of 1927 PA 372 (MCL 28.421 & 28.422) & adds sec. 12c.

TX HB910

Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry a holstered handgun; creating criminal offenses.

TX SB17

Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry a holstered handgun; creating a criminal offense; providing penalties.

TX HB1651

Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry a secured handgun; creating a criminal offense; providing penalties.