California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1510

Introduced
3/4/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/12/25  
Refer
5/13/25  
Refer
5/21/25  
Report Pass
5/28/25  
Refer
5/28/25  
Report Pass
6/13/25  
Refer
6/13/25  
Report Pass
6/25/25  
Refer
6/25/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/9/25  

Caption

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: employee relations.

Impact

The introduction of AB 1510 is likely to streamline the process for addressing labor disputes within the VTA and enhance the enforcement power of PERB. By allowing aggrieved parties to directly challenge decisions made by the board, the bill aims to ensure that unfair labor practices are rectified more efficiently. This reform could potentially lengthen the timeline for resolving disputes, thus affecting labor relations and operational efficiency for the VTA.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1510 aims to enhance the process for addressing unfair labor practices within the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). This bill establishes procedures allowing any party affected by a final decision or order from the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) regarding unfair practice cases to petition for a writ of extraordinary relief. The legislation outlines the necessary steps for filing such petitions, which must be done within 30 days of PERB's final decision.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1510 appears to be mixed but leaning positively among labor advocates and public employee unions. Proponents see the legislation as a necessary step towards protecting workers' rights and ensuring fair treatment in labor disputes. However, some concerns have been raised about the potential consequences of enabling more litigation in labor relations and whether it may overwhelm the existing legal framework.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding AB 1510 revolves around the necessity of a special statute for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, asserting that existing laws were inadequate to address their unique needs. Critics may argue that such specific legislation complicates the regulatory framework and could create disparities in how labor issues are handled across different public agencies within California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2812

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.

CA AB939

Santa Clara Valley Water District.

CA AB1958

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: board of directors.

CA AB1469

Santa Clara Valley Water District.

CA AB2682

Santa Clara Valley Open-Space Authority.

CA AB1672

In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act.

CA AB2889

Local public employee relations: the City of Los Angeles Employee Relations Board and the Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission.

CA AB1471

Hospitals: seismic compliance: O’Connor Hospital and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center.

CA AB2798

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB1649

Local Agency Public Construction Act: change orders: County of Santa Clara.

Similar Bills

CA AB2886

Public Employee Relations Board: Orange County Transportation Authority: San Joaquin Regional Transit District.

CA AB355

Public Employment Relations Board: Orange County Transportation Authority.

CA AB2798

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA SB957

Public Employment Relations Board: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District: employee relations.

CA AB2850

Public transit employer-employee relations: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

CA SB598

Sacramento Regional Transit District: employee relations.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.