California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB355

Introduced
2/4/19  
Introduced
2/4/19  
Refer
2/11/19  
Refer
2/11/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Refer
6/12/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/6/19  
Enrolled
9/6/19  
Chaptered
10/10/19  
Passed
10/10/19  

Caption

Public Employment Relations Board: Orange County Transportation Authority.

Impact

The enactment of AB 355 will officially categorize disputes arising from labor arrangements at the Orange County Transportation Authority as unfair practice issues subject to resolution by PERB. This represents a significant shift because it aligns OCTA with other public employers that are regulated under California's Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, which governs public sector labor relations. The bill necessitates that complaints regarding labor violations be adjudicated by PERB, ensuring a more consistent application of labor rights and facilitating better oversight of labor practices within the agency.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 355, introduced by Assemblymember Daly, amends the Public Utilities Code to extend the jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) to include the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). This bill integrates OCTA employees into the framework of collective bargaining overseen by PERB, which was previously not applicable to them. The primary objective of this legislation is to ensure that any labor disputes or allegations of unfair practices within OCTA are dealt with under the same standards that apply to other public entities in California, thus enhancing the protections for employees engaged in collective bargaining.

Sentiment

The legislative discussion surrounding AB 355 has demonstrated a generally positive sentiment towards the bill, as it is seen as a necessary step in protecting employee rights within the public transportation sector. Supporters argue that this helps in creating equitable labor relations where employees can seek fair resolutions to disputes. Conversely, there may be some apprehension among certain stakeholders regarding the added regulatory oversight and potential changes in labor relations dynamics at the OCTA.

Contention

Notably, the bill also addresses the potential costs associated with these new mandates by stating that if the Commission on State Mandates identifies any state-mandated costs incurred by local agencies, the state will provide reimbursement as per established procedures. This provision attempts to alleviate concerns from local agencies about financial burdens resulting from the implementation of the bill. As such, while the bill is meant to reinforce labor rights, it also ensures that financial implications for local authorities are considered.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2886

Public Employee Relations Board: Orange County Transportation Authority: San Joaquin Regional Transit District.

CA SB957

Public Employment Relations Board: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District: employee relations.

CA AB2850

Public transit employer-employee relations: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

CA SB598

Sacramento Regional Transit District: employee relations.

CA AB1510

State employees: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: employee relations.

CA AB314

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB969

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.