San Diego County Air Pollution Control District: governing board: alternate members.
Impact
AB 652 is designed to enhance the governance of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District by allowing alternate members to participate in decisions in the absence of regular members. Each governing board member is required to serve a four-year term, and the bill mandates a random drawing procedure during the first board meeting of 2029 to select two members for a shorter two-year term. This amendment aims to encourage broader participation and ensure that the board maintains its function effectively amidst transitions and vacancies.
Summary
Assembly Bill 652, introduced by Assembly Member Alvarez, amends Section 40100.6 of the Health and Safety Code pertaining to the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District's governing board. The bill modifies the selection process for board members, allowing for greater flexibility by enabling city selection committee members to choose either a mayor or a city council member from the appropriate supervisorial district. It also introduces the option for each appointing authority to designate an alternate member to serve in place of the regular member when absent, which underscores an effort to ensure continuous representation on the board.
Sentiment
The general sentiment regarding AB 652 appears to be supportive, especially among legislative entities focused on public health and environmental concerns. Supporters argue that the inclusion of alternate members and flexible appointments can strengthen the board's functionality and its decisions regarding air quality and public health standards. As air pollution poses a significant challenge in urban areas, stakeholders in health and environmental sectors view these changes as positive and necessary.
Contention
While most discussions around AB 652 have been constructive, potential points of contention could arise regarding the balance of power within the board, specifically concerning who can be appointed as an alternate member. Critics may argue that the selection process should ensure diversity and representation reflective of San Diego's demographic fabric, particularly in addressing issues of environmental justice. Moreover, the requirement for members to consult with military entities on pollution regulations could lead to debates over the extent of influence these bodies may have on local governance.