The impact of AB 818 on state laws is notable as it alters the Permit Streamlining Act, enhancing the responsibilities of local agencies. By requiring prompt decisions on permit applications for affected properties, it aims to streamline efforts for rebuilding. Moreover, it specifies that the state deems this issue a matter of statewide concern, which extends the bill's provisions to all cities, including charter cities. Importantly, the bill also states that no reimbursement is required to be provided by the state to local agencies for costs incurred due to these new mandates, indicating a shift in financial responsibility.
Summary
Assembly Bill 818, known as the Permit Streamlining Act regarding local emergencies, introduces significant changes to the approval process for building permits in the wake of declared local emergencies. The bill mandates that cities and counties must approve or deny applications for building permits or equivalent permits within 10 business days of receipt. This is aimed at accelerating the recovery and rebuilding process for properties affected by disasters, thus addressing an urgent need for housing in the aftermath of such events.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 818 is generally positive among proponents who emphasize the necessity for expedited rebuilding efforts during local emergencies. Supporters argue that the bill would provide clear guidelines and prompt action from local agencies, facilitating quicker recovery for communities hit by disasters. However, there are concerns from some stakeholders about the potential burdens placed on local governments without the provision of additional funding, which might lead to complications in implementation.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the financial implications and operational strains placed on local agencies. Critics argue that while the goal of expediting housing recovery is commendable, the requirement for expedited permit processing might overwhelm local resources, especially in larger jurisdictions. There are calls for clearer guidance and support for municipalities that could struggle to balance these new responsibilities with existing workloads, highlighting a need for a comprehensive approach to disaster recovery planning.
Real property development: San Francisco: downtown revitalization zone: welfare tax exemption and California Environmental Quality Act exemption and streamlining.