Colorado 2022 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB115 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1+Second Regular Session
2+Seventy-third General Assembly
3+STATE OF COLORADO
4+REREVISED
5+This Version Includes All Amendments
6+Adopted in the Second House
7+LLS NO. 22-0234.01 Shelby Ross x4510
18 SENATE BILL 22-115
2-BY SENATOR(S) Jaquez Lewis and Gardner, Bridges, Buckner, Coleman,
3-Coram, Ginal, Gonzales, Hisey, Kirkmeyer, Kolker, Lee, Liston, Lundeen,
4-Moreno, Priola, Simpson, Smallwood, Winter, Woodward, Zenzinger;
5-also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Soper and Tipper, Bockenfeld, Esgar,
6-Roberts.
9+Senate Committees House Committees
10+Judiciary Judiciary
11+A BILL FOR AN ACT
712 C
8-ONCERNING CLARIFYING CERTAIN TERMS AS THE TERMS RELATE TO A
9-LANDOWNER
10-'S LIABILITY.
11-
12-Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
13-SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly
14-finds and declares that:
15-(a) Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Wagner, 2020 CO
16-51, 467 P.3d 287 and Wagner v. Planned Parenthood Federation of
17-America, Inc., 2019 COA 26, 471 P.3d 1089, are contrary to the stated
18-purpose of the landowner liability statute to the extent that they do not
19-create a legal climate that will promote private property rights and
20-commercial enterprise and foster the availability and affordability of
21-insurance; and
22-NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative
23-officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill
24-or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative
25-history, or the Session Laws.
26-________
27-Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
28-through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
29-the act. (b) In light of the Colorado court of appeals and supreme court
30-decisions in Wagner, and solely to the extent that Wagner contravenes
31-existing Colorado law and public policy, the general assembly finds it
32-necessary and appropriate to amend the landowner liability statute to clarify
33-its scope and meaning. In doing so, the general assembly does not intend to
34-expand or constrict the protections afforded to landowners and invitees
35-under the landowner liability statute, or any other statute, including but not
36-limited to the "Claire Davis School Safety Act", or to reject or otherwise
37-disturb any judicial decision other than Wagner.
38-SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 13-21-115 as
39-follows:
40-13-21-115. Actions against landowners - short title - legislative
41-declaration - definitions. (1) For the purposes of this section, "landowner"
42-includes, without limitation, an authorized agent or a person in possession
43-of real property and a person legally responsible for the condition of real
44-property or for the activities conducted or circumstances existing on real
45-property. THE SHORT TITLE OF THIS SECTION IS THE "COLORADO PREMISES
46-LIABILITY ACT".
47-(1.5) (2) The general assembly hereby finds and declares THAT:
48-(a) That The provisions of this section were enacted in 1986 to
49-promote a state policy of responsibility by both landowners and those upon
50-the land as well as to assure
51- ENSURE that the ability of an injured party to
52-recover is correlated with his THE INJURED PARTY'S status as a trespasser,
53-licensee, or invitee;
54-(b) That These objectives were characterized by the Colorado
55-supreme court as "legitimate governmental interests" in Gallegos v. Phipps,
56-No. 88 SA 141 (September 18, 1989) 779 P.2d 856 (COLO. 1989);
57-(c) That The purpose of amending this section in the 1990
58-legislative session is WAS to:
59-(I) Assure ENSURE that the language of this section effectuates these
60-legitimate governmental interests by imposing on landowners a higher
61-standard of care with respect to an invitee than a licensee and a higher
62-standard of care with respect to a licensee than a trespasser;
63-AND
64-PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 22-115 (d) That the purpose of this section is also to
65-(II) Create a legal climate which THAT will promote private property
66-rights and commercial enterprise and will foster the availability and
67-affordability of insurance;
68-(e) (d) That The general assembly recognizes that by amending this
69-section it is not reinstating the common law status categories as they existed
70-immediately prior to Mile Hi Fence v. Radovich, 175 Colo. 537, 489 P.2d
71-308 (1971) but that its purpose is to protect landowners from liability in
72-some circumstances when they were not protected at common law and to
73-define the instances when liability will be imposed in the manner most
74-consistent with the policies set forth in paragraphs (a), (c), and (d) of this
75-subsection (1.5) SUBSECTIONS (2)(a) AND (2)(c) OF THIS SECTION; AND
76-(e) (I) THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD, INC. V.
13+ONCERNING CLARIFYING CERTAIN TERMS AS THE TERMS RELATE TO101
14+A LANDOWNER'S LIABILITY.102
15+Bill Summary
16+(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does
17+not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill
18+passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that
19+applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at
20+http://leg.colorado.gov
21+.)
22+The bill clarifies the meaning of terms related to landowner
23+liability and declares that the Colorado court of appeals and supreme
24+court decisions in Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Wagner
25+should not be relied upon to the extent that those decisions determined:
26+! The foreseeability of third-party criminal conduct based
27+upon whether the goods or services offered by a landowner
28+HOUSE
29+3rd Reading Unamended
30+March 16, 2022
31+HOUSE
32+Amended 2nd Reading
33+March 15, 2022
34+SENATE
35+3rd Reading Unamended
36+February 23, 2022
37+SENATE
38+2nd Reading Unamended
39+February 22, 2022
40+SENATE SPONSORSHIP
41+Jaquez Lewis and Gardner, Bridges, Buckner, Coleman, Coram, Ginal, Gonzales, Hisey,
42+Kirkmeyer, Kolker, Lee, Liston, Lundeen, Moreno, Priola, Simpson, Smallwood, Winter,
43+Woodward, Zenzinger
44+HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
45+Soper and Tipper, Bockenfeld, Esgar, Roberts
46+Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
47+Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statute.
48+Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute. are controversial; and
49+! That a landowner could be held liable as a substantial
50+factor in causing harm without considering whether a
51+third-party criminal act was the predominant cause of that
52+harm.
53+Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1
54+SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly2
55+finds and declares that:3
56+(a) Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Wagner, 20204
57+CO 51, 467 P.3d 287 and Wagner v. Planned Parenthood Federation of5
58+America, Inc., 2019 COA 26, 471 P.3d 1089, are contrary to the stated6
59+purpose of the landowner liability statute to the extent that
60+they do not7
61+create a legal climate that will promote private property rights and8
62+commercial enterprise and foster the availability and affordability of9
63+insurance; and10
64+(b) In light of the Colorado court of appeals and supreme court11
65+decisions in Wagner, and solely to the extent that Wagner contravenes12
66+existing Colorado law and public policy, the general assembly finds it13
67+necessary and appropriate to amend the landowner liability statute to14
68+clarify its scope and meaning. In doing so, the general assembly does not15
69+intend to expand or constrict the protections afforded to landowners and16
70+invitees under the landowner liability statute, or any other statute,17
71+including but not limited to the "Claire Davis School Safety Act", or to18
72+reject or otherwise disturb any judicial decision other than Wagner.19
73+SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 13-21-115 as20
74+follows:21
75+13-21-115. Actions against landowners - short title - legislative22
76+declaration - definitions. (1) For the purposes of this section,23
77+115-2- "landowner" includes, without limitation, an authorized agent or a person1
78+in possession of real property and a person legally responsible for the2
79+condition of real property or for the activities conducted or circumstances3
80+existing on real property.4
81+(1.5) THE SHORT TITLE OF THIS SECTION IS THE "COLORADO5
82+P
83+REMISES LIABILITY ACT".6
84+(2) The general assembly hereby
85+ finds and declares THAT:7
86+(a) That The provisions of this section were enacted in 1986 to8
87+promote a state policy of responsibility by both landowners and those9
88+upon the land as well as to assure ENSURE that the ability of an injured10
89+party to recover is correlated with his THE INJURED PARTY'S status as a11
90+trespasser, licensee, or invitee;12
91+(b) That These objectives were characterized by the Colorado13
92+supreme court as "legitimate governmental interests" in Gallegos v.14
93+Phipps, No. 88 SA 141 (September 18, 1989) 779 P.2d 856 (COLO. 1989);15
94+(c) That The purpose of amending this section in the 199016
95+legislative session is WAS to:17
96+(I) Assure ENSURE that the language of this section effectuates18
97+these legitimate governmental interests by imposing on landowners a19
98+higher standard of care with respect to an invitee than a licensee and a20
99+higher standard of care with respect to a licensee than a trespasser;
100+AND21
101+(d) That the purpose of this section is also to
102+22
103+(II) Create a legal climate which THAT will promote private23
104+property rights and commercial enterprise and will foster the availability24
105+and affordability of insurance;25
106+(e) (d) That The general assembly recognizes that by amending26
107+this section it is not reinstating the common law status categories as they27
108+115
109+-3- existed immediately prior to Mile Hi Fence v. Radovich, 175 Colo. 537,1
110+489 P.2d 308 (1971) but that its purpose is to protect landowners from2
111+liability in some circumstances when they were not protected at common3
112+law and to define the instances when liability will be imposed in the4
113+manner most consistent with the policies set forth in paragraphs (a), (c),5
114+and (d) of this subsection (1.5) SUBSECTIONS (2)(a) AND (2)(c) OF THIS6
115+SECTION; AND7
116+(e) (I) THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD, INC. V.8
77117 W
78-AGNER, 2020 CO 51, 467 P.3d 287, AND WAGNER V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD
79-FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., 2019 COA 26, 471 P.3d 1089, DECISIONS DO
80-NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
81-REGARDING LANDOWNER LIABILITY AND MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON IN
82-APPLYING THIS SECTION TO THE EXTENT THAT THE MAJORITY OPINIONS
83-DETERMINED
84-:
118+AGNER, 2020 CO 51, 467 P.3d 287,
119+AND WAGNER V. PLANNED9
120+P
121+ARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., 2019 COA 26, 471 P.3d10
122+1089,
123+ DECISIONS
124+DO NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE INTENT OF THE11
125+GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING LANDOWNER LIABILITY AND MUST NOT12
126+BE RELIED UPON IN APPLYING THIS SECTION TO THE EXTENT THAT THE13
127+MAJORITY OPINIONS DETERMINED :14
85128 (A) T
86-HE FORESEEABILITY OF THIRD-PARTY CRIMINAL CONDUCT
87-BASED UPON WHETHER THE GOODS OR SERVICES OFFERED BY A LANDOWNER
88-ARE CONTROVERSIAL
89-; AND
90-(B) THAT A LANDOWNER COULD BE HELD LIABLE AS A SUBSTANTIAL
91-FACTOR IN CAUSING HARM WITHOUT CONSIDERING WHETHER A THIRD
92--PARTY
93-CRIMINAL ACT WAS THE PREDOMINANT CAUSE OF THAT HARM
94-, AS NOTED BY
95-THE DISSENTING JUSTICES AND JUDGE
96-.
129+HE FORESEEABILITY OF THIRD-PARTY CRIMINAL CONDUCT15
130+BASED UPON WHETHER THE GOODS OR SERVICES OFFERED BY A16
131+LANDOWNER ARE CONTROVERSIAL ; AND17
132+(B) T
133+HAT A LANDOWNER COULD BE HELD LIABLE AS A18
134+SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN CAUSING HARM WITHOUT CONSIDERING WHETHER19
135+A THIRD-PARTY CRIMINAL ACT WAS THE PREDOMINANT CAUSE OF THAT20
136+HARM, AS NOTED BY THE DISSENTING JUSTICES AND JUDGE .21
97137 (II) I
98-N MAKING THIS DECLARATION, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DOES
99-NOT INTEND TO REJECT OR OTHERWISE DISTURB ANY JUDICIAL DECISION
100-OTHER THAN THE
101-WAGNER DECISIONS .
138+N MAKING THIS DECLARATION, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DOES22
139+NOT INTEND TO REJECT OR OTHERWISE DISTURB ANY JUDICIAL DECISION23
140+OTHER THAN THE WAGNER DECISIONS .24
102141 (2)
103- (3) In any civil action brought against a landowner by a person
104-who alleges injury occurring while on the real property of another and by
105-reason of the condition of such property, or activities conducted or
106-circumstances existing on such property, the landowner shall be
107- IS liable
108-PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 22-115 only as provided in subsection (3) SUBSECTION (4) of this section. Sections
109-13-21-111, 13-21-111.5, and 13-21-111.7 shall apply to an action to which
110-this section applies. This subsection (2) shall SUBSECTION (3) MUST not be
111-construed to abrogate the doctrine of attractive nuisance as applied to
112-persons under fourteen years of age. A person who is at least fourteen years
113-of age but is less than eighteen years of age shall be
114- IS presumed competent
115-for purposes of the application of this section.
116-(3) (4) (a) A trespasser may ONLY recover only for damages
117-willfully or deliberately caused by the landowner.
142+ (3) In any civil action brought against a landowner by a person25
143+who alleges injury occurring while on the real property of another and by26
144+reason of the condition of such property, or activities conducted or27
145+115
146+-4- circumstances existing on such property, the landowner shall be IS liable1
147+only as provided in subsection (3) SUBSECTION (4) of this section.2
148+Sections 13-21-111, 13-21-111.5, and 13-21-111.7 shall apply to an3
149+action to which this section applies. This subsection (2) shall SUBSECTION4
150+(3)
151+ MUST not be construed to abrogate the doctrine of attractive nuisance5
152+as applied to persons under fourteen years of age. A person who is at least6
153+fourteen years of age but is less than eighteen years of age shall be
154+ IS7
155+presumed competent for purposes of the application of this section.8
156+(3) (4) (a) A trespasser may ONLY recover only for damages9
157+willfully or deliberately caused by the landowner.10
118158 (b) A licensee may
119159 ONLY recover only for
120- damages caused:
121-(I) By the landowner's unreasonable failure to exercise reasonable
122-care with respect to dangers created by the landowner of which THAT the
160+ damages caused:11
161+(I) By the landowner's unreasonable failure to exercise reasonable12
162+care with respect to dangers created by the landowner of which THAT the13
123163 landowner actually knew
124-ABOUT; or
125-(II) By the landowner's unreasonable failure to warn of dangers not
126-created by the landowner which
127- THAT are not ordinarily present on property
128-of the type involved and of which THAT the landowner actually knew
129-ABOUT.
164+ABOUT; or14
165+(II) By the landowner's unreasonable failure to warn of dangers15
166+not created by the landowner which
167+ THAT are not ordinarily present on16
168+property of the type involved and of which THAT the landowner actually17
169+knew
170+ABOUT.18
130171 (c) (I) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (II) of this
131-paragraph (c) SUBSECTION (4)(c)(II) OF THIS SECTION, an invitee may
132-recover for damages caused by the landowner's unreasonable failure to
133-exercise reasonable care to protect against dangers of which he
134- THE
135-LANDOWNER
136- actually knew ABOUT or should have known ABOUT.
137-(II) If the landowner's real property is classified for property tax
138-purposes as agricultural land or vacant land, an invitee may recover for
139-damages caused by the landowner's unreasonable failure to exercise
140-reasonable care to protect against dangers of which he
141- THE LANDOWNER
142-actually knew ABOUT.
143-(3.5) (5) It is the intent of the general assembly in enacting the
144-provisions of subsection (3) SUBSECTION (4) of this section that the
145-circumstances under which a licensee may recover include all of the
146-circumstances under which a trespasser could recover and that the
147-circumstances under which an invitee may recover include all of the
148-circumstances under which a trespasser or a licensee could recover.
149-PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 22-115 (4) (6) In any action to which this section applies, the judge COURT
150-shall determine whether the plaintiff is a trespasser, a licensee, or an invitee,
151-in accordance with the definitions set forth in subsection (5) SUBSECTION (7)
152-of this section. If two or more landowners are parties defendant PARTY
153-DEFENDANTS
154- to the action, the judge
155- COURT shall determine the application
156-of this section to each such landowner. The issues of liability and damages
157-in any such action shall MUST be determined by the jury or, if there is no
158-jury, by the judge COURT.
159-(5) (7) As used in this section, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE
160-REQUIRES
161-:
162-(a) "Invitee" means a person who enters or remains on the land of
163-another to transact business in which the parties are mutually interested or
164-who enters or remains on such land in response to the landowner's express
165-or implied representation that the public is requested, expected, or intended
166-to enter or remain.
172+19
173+paragraph (c) SUBSECTION (4)(c)(II) OF THIS SECTION, an invitee may20
174+recover for damages caused by the landowner's unreasonable failure to21
175+exercise reasonable care to protect against dangers of which he THE22
176+LANDOWNER actually knew ABOUT or should have known ABOUT.23
177+(II) If the landowner's real property is classified for property tax24
178+purposes as agricultural land or vacant land, an invitee may recover for25
179+damages caused by the landowner's unreasonable failure to exercise26
180+reasonable care to protect against dangers of which he THE LANDOWNER27
181+115
182+-5- actually knew ABOUT.1
183+(3.5) (5) It is the intent of the general assembly in enacting the2
184+provisions of subsection (3) SUBSECTION (4) of this section that the3
185+circumstances under which a licensee may recover include all of the4
186+circumstances under which a trespasser could recover and that the5
187+circumstances under which an invitee may recover include all of the6
188+circumstances under which a trespasser or a licensee could recover.7
189+(4) (6) In any action to which this section applies, the judge8
190+COURT shall determine whether the plaintiff is a trespasser, a licensee, or9
191+an invitee, in accordance with the definitions set forth in subsection (5)10
192+SUBSECTION (7) of this section. If two or more landowners are parties11
193+defendant PARTY DEFENDANTS to the action, the judge COURT shall12
194+determine the application of this section to each such landowner. The13
195+issues of liability and damages in any such action shall MUST be14
196+determined by the jury or, if there is no jury, by the judge COURT.15
197+(5) (7) As used in this section, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE16
198+REQUIRES:17
199+(a) "Invitee" means a person who enters or remains on the land of18
200+another to transact business in which the parties are mutually interested19
201+or who enters or remains on such land in response to the landowner's20
202+express or implied representation that the public is requested, expected,21
203+or intended to enter or remain.22
167204 (b) "L
168-ANDOWNER" MEANS, WITHOUT LIMITATION, AN AUTHORIZED
169-AGENT OR A PERSON IN POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY AND A PERSON
170-LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDITION OF REAL PROPERTY OR FOR THE
171-ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED OR CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING ON REAL PROPERTY
172-.
173-(b)
174- (c) "Licensee" means a person who enters or remains on the land
175-of another for the licensee's own convenience or to advance his THE
176-LICENSEE
177-'S own interests, pursuant to the landowner's permission or
178-consent. "Licensee" includes a social guest.
179-(c)
180- (d) "Trespasser" means a person who enters or remains on the
181-land of another without the landowner's consent.
182-(6) (8) If any provision of this section is found by a court of
183-competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of
184-the section shall be
185- ARE deemed valid.
186-SECTION 3. Applicability. This act applies to actions pending on
187-or after the effective date of this act.
188-SECTION 4. Safety clause. The general assembly hereby finds,
189-PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 22-115 determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate
190-preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.
191-____________________________ ____________________________
192-Steve Fenberg Alec Garnett
193-PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
194-THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES
195-____________________________ ____________________________
196-Cindi L. Markwell Robin Jones
197-SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE
198-THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES
199- APPROVED________________________________________
200- (Date and Time)
201- _________________________________________
202- Jared S. Polis
203- GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
204-PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 22-115
205+ANDOWNER" MEANS, WITHOUT LIMITATION, AN AUTHORIZED23
206+AGENT OR A PERSON IN POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY AND A PERSON24
207+LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDITION OF REAL PROPERTY OR FOR25
208+THE ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED OR CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING ON REAL26
209+PROPERTY.27
210+115
211+-6- (b) (c) "Licensee" means a person who enters or remains on the1
212+land of another for the licensee's own convenience or to advance his THE2
213+LICENSEE'S own interests, pursuant to the landowner's permission or3
214+consent. "Licensee" includes a social guest.4
215+(c) (d) "Trespasser" means a person who enters or remains on the5
216+land of another without the landowner's consent.6
217+(6) (8) If any provision of this section is found by a court of7
218+competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of8
219+the section shall be ARE deemed valid.9
220+SECTION 3. Applicability. This act applies to actions pending10
221+on or after the effective date of this act.11
222+SECTION 4. Safety clause. The general assembly hereby finds,12
223+determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate13
224+preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.14
225+115
226+-7-