Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB267

Introduced
4/4/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/24/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Engrossed
4/25/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/6/23  
Refer
5/6/23  
Enrolled
5/8/23  
Engrossed
5/16/23  
Engrossed
5/17/23  
Enrolled
5/17/23  

Caption

Chatfield State Park Water Quality Fee

Impact

This legislation is poised to slightly modify state law by embedding a fee structure for park access specifically tied to environmental management. The implementation of the fee aims to facilitate proactive measures in managing water quality, addressing challenges posed by urban runoff and pollution that may arise from increased recreational activities at Chatfield State Park. The fee's existence could potentially empower the Chatfield Watershed Authority to secure necessary funding for critical conservation initiatives, ultimately ensuring the maintenance of water quality standards vital for local ecosystems.

Summary

Senate Bill 267, known as the Chatfield State Park Water Quality Fee Bill, proposes the establishment of a water quality fee to be paid for admission to Chatfield State Park. The bill mandates that the Division of Parks and Wildlife will collect this fee from visitors, which will then be transferred to the Chatfield Watershed Authority. The funds generated through this fee are intended to support various water quality projects aimed at preserving the ecological integrity of the watershed, enhancing recreational facilities, and managing urban runoff and erosion control efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB 267 appears largely positive among environmental advocates and stakeholders concerned with the maintenance of water quality within the Chatfield Reservoir. Supporters believe the measure is a proactive approach to environmental preservation while enhancing recreational experiences. Nevertheless, there could be potential opposition regarding any additional costs to park visitors, which may be perceived as burdensome by some members of the public or those wary of increased state regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the appropriateness of imposing an additional fee on park visitors, particularly as it relates to existing entrance fees. Critics may express concerns regarding the financial implications on ordinary citizens, especially families or individuals who frequent the park. Furthermore, discussions about the accountability and effectiveness of the Chatfield Watershed Authority in utilizing the collected funds for water quality projects could arise, leading to debates over transparency and management practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CO SB127

Regulate Dredged & Fill Material State Waters

CO HB1379

Regulate Dredge & Fill Activities in State Waters

CO SB165

Air Quality Improvements

CO SB230

Oil & Gas Production Fees

CO SB161

Parks & Wildlife Licenses & Passes

CO SB095

Air Quality Ozone Levels

CO SB037

Study Green Infrastructure for Water Quality Management

CO HJR1018

Grand Lake Water Clarity

CO HB1304

Minimum Parking Requirements

CO HB1203

Capital Construction Supplemental

Similar Bills

MN HF3240

Chatfield; emergency services facility funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

IL SR0534

MEMORIAL-MELVIN A. HISEY

NM HB137

Strategic Water Supply Act

NM HB126

Soil And Water Conservation Districts Funding

NM HB162

Repeal Firearm Sale Waiting Period

NM SB1

Water Trust Fund

CT SB00376

An Act Concerning State Grant Commitments For School Building Projects, Municipal Accounts For Surplus Education Funds And Revisions To Certain Library Statutes.

NM HB362

Rainfall Enhancement Pilot Project