Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06549

Introduced
3/4/11  
Refer
3/4/11  
Refer
3/4/11  
Report Pass
3/30/11  
Report Pass
3/30/11  
Refer
4/8/11  
Refer
4/8/11  
Report Pass
4/14/11  
Report Pass
4/14/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Engrossed
6/1/11  
Engrossed
6/1/11  
Report Pass
6/2/11  
Report Pass
6/2/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Passed
7/13/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Public Health's Oversight Responsibilities Relating To Scope Of Practice Determinations For Health Care Professions.

Impact

This bill is significant in its impact on state laws related to healthcare regulation, primarily as it formalizes the procedures that healthcare professions must follow to expand or alter their scope of practice. By providing a clear framework for making these requests, it aims to enhance public access to health care while ensuring that health care safety and quality are not compromised. The process allows for state oversight and strives for transparency regarding how scope requests may affect existing health care systems and professions.

Summary

House Bill 06549, titled 'An Act Concerning The Department Of Public Health's Oversight Responsibilities Relating To Scope Of Practice Determinations For Health Care Professions,' establishes a structured process for health care professions to request changes to their scope of practice. The bill requires that any entity acting on behalf of a health care profession file a written request to the Department of Public Health by a specified deadline. Each request must detail the proposed changes, encompass the anticipated benefits to public health and safety, and include an economic impact assessment along with relevant documentation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 06549 appears largely positive, especially among proponents who believe that clearly defined scope of practice processes will facilitate better health care access and allow healthcare professionals to operate more effectively within their education and training. However, there may also be concerns regarding the compliance burden this places on healthcare professionals seeking to make changes, as well as the potential for disagreements between different health care professions regarding overlapping scopes of practice.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the requirements for public input and the evaluations conducted by committees formed under the bill. Stakeholders in the healthcare system may have differing opinions about what constitutes adequate justification for changes in practice scope. Additionally, the need for committees and the Department of Public Health to evaluate each request could lead to calls for reviews on the timing and efficiency of these processes, especially when timely health care delivery is a concern.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1590

Political Reform Act of 1974.

NJ S2788

Appropriates $128.241 million from constitutionally dedicated CBT revenues to State Agriculture Development Committee for farmland preservation purposes.

CA SB1239

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.

NJ A4569

Appropriates $128.241 million from constitutionally dedicated CBT revenues to State Agriculture Development Committee for farmland preservation purposes.

CA AB1367

Political Reform Act of 1974: committee accounts and campaign funds.

CA AB201

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosure: text messages.

CA SB569

Political Reform Act of 1974: audits.

CA AB808

Campaign statements and other reports: submission by facsimile.