Connecticut Senate Bill SB00889

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/11
• Refer: 2/3/11
• Report Pass: 2/22/11
• Refer: 3/4/11
• Report Pass: 3/10/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Report Pass: 4/28/11
• Chaptered: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/20/11
• Passed: 5/24/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical And Minor Corrections To The Public Safety Statutes.

Impact

The enactment of SB00889 is intended to have a notable impact on the clarity and enforcement of existing public safety laws in the state. By updating and amending specific old provisions, the bill aims to eliminate confusion regarding operational regulations for events like raffles, thereby enhancing community compliance and safety standards. Furthermore, the bill addresses the efficiency of the permit issuance process for conducting such activities, which could positively influence the operational landscape for organizations wishing to engage in fundraising events.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 889, also known as an Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical And Minor Corrections To The Public Safety Statutes, addresses multiple technical corrections within the state's public safety regulations. It seeks to streamline and correct existing statutes that govern various aspects of public safety, including gambling and permit processes for operational activities like bazaars and raffles. The bill is particularly focused on clarifying provisions regarding the oversight of off-track betting facilities and ensuring effective regulation of such establishments in accordance with local and state laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00889 appears to be supportive among the legislative body, largely due to its technical nature focused on corrections rather than introducing any radically new regulations. Stakeholders involved in the public safety and gambling sectors express a sense of relief that outdated or unclear statutes will be rectified. However, some individual advocates for gambling reform might argue that while this bill is necessary, it does not capture broader reform efforts that could include more extensive oversight or regulation improvements.

Contention

Though the bill primarily aims to make minor corrections, there are potential points of contention concerning how local municipalities will interpret these amendments, especially in relation to off-track betting facilities. There could be concerns from community advocates about regulating gambling too leniently and ensuring that local governance retains authority over how such establishments operate within their jurisdictions. The ongoing dialogue will likely center around balancing state mandates with local control.