Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00936

Introduced
2/9/11  
Introduced
2/9/11  
Refer
2/9/11  
Refer
2/9/11  
Report Pass
3/1/11  
Report Pass
3/1/11  
Refer
3/7/11  
Refer
3/7/11  
Report Pass
3/14/11  
Report Pass
3/14/11  
Refer
4/7/11  
Refer
4/7/11  
Report Pass
4/25/11  
Report Pass
4/25/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Engrossed
5/26/11  
Engrossed
5/26/11  
Report Pass
5/28/11  
Chaptered
6/17/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Passed
7/8/11  

Caption

An Act Extending The Look-back Period To Determine Eligibility For Unemployment Compensation Extended Benefits.

Impact

The legislation directly affects individuals seeking unemployment benefits by allowing more flexibility in the look-back period for eligibility assessment. Under the revised regulations, applicants who might not meet the strict criteria in a shorter time frame may find themselves eligible for support for a more extended period. This change could alleviate some of the financial stress faced by many families and help to stabilize the economy during downturns. It encourages continued workforce participation even in challenging economic climates.

Summary

SB00936 is an act designed to extend the look-back period for determining eligibility for unemployment compensation extended benefits. This legislation modifies the existing criteria under which individuals may qualify for extended benefits during unemployment periods in the state. By extending the look-back period, the bill aims to provide additional support to those who may have struggled with ongoing unemployment, ensuring that more individuals can qualify for benefits during economic hardships.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00936 appears to be predominantly positive, particularly among labor advocates and supporters of unemployment benefits. Proponents believe that extending the look-back period is a necessary adaptation in a rapidly changing job market, providing needed relief to unemployed individuals. However, there may be concerns voiced by those wary of potential fiscal impacts or the effectiveness of extended unemployment benefits on workforce reintegration.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, there may be contention around how long the look-back period should be extended and whether the increased eligibility will lead to fiscal strain on state resources. Some opponents could argue that extended benefits might disincentivize job searching, though supporters counter that the economic environment necessitates such support. This conflict underscores a broader debate about the balance between providing necessary assistance and fostering a resilient labor market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB103

Unemployment compensation benefits: COVID-19.

CA SB811

Unemployment compensation benefits: COVID-19.

CA SB39

Fraudulent claims: inmates.

CA AB397

Unemployment insurance: benefits: disqualification: notice.

CA AB1066

Unemployment compensation: benefits payable: collection.

CA AB74

Communications: universal service: lifeline program.

CA AB1596

Unemployment: federal unemployment account: advances repayment.

MN HF784

Unemployment; penalties for misrepresentation overpayment modified, and opportunities to appeal extended.