Connecticut House Bill HB05530

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/15/12
• Refer: 3/15/12
• Report Pass: 3/22/12
• Refer: 4/2/12
• Report Pass: 4/10/12

Caption

An Act Concerning A Study On The Waiver Of Fines And Penalties For Certain Business Regulation Violations.

Impact

The bill's implementation could significantly influence how regulatory penalties are applied in Connecticut. By allowing for waivers on initial violations, the legislation seeks to encourage compliance and support businesses in rectifying any regulatory lapses without the financial burden of fines. This approach is intended to foster a collaborative environment between the state and businesses, emphasizing the importance of rectification and compliance rather than punitive measures.

Summary

House Bill 05530 proposes a study regarding the potential waiver of fines and penalties for certain business regulation violations in Connecticut. Specifically, the bill mandates that the Departments of Energy and Environmental Protection and Public Health work together to evaluate existing regulations and recommend legislative changes. The central aim is to allow businesses to potentially abate civil penalties imposed for first-time violations, provided that these businesses undertake full remedial measures within thirty days of the penalty assessment. The proposed changes would be applicable to penalties or fines assessed after July 1, 2013.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 05530 appears to be supportive, particularly from business advocacy groups who view it as a step towards reducing the regulatory burden on small businesses and fostering a more supportive business environment. However, opponents may express concerns about the potential implications of waiving penalties, arguing that such measures could diminish the seriousness of regulatory compliance and potentially encourage negligence among businesses regarding their regulatory responsibilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may arise around the fairness and effectiveness of waiving penalties for first-time violations. Critics may raise concerns about whether this could lead to a lack of accountability and whether businesses would take the necessary corrective actions without the deterrent effect of financial penalties. The balance between encouraging compliance and maintaining robust oversight is likely to be a central theme in discussions about the bill.