Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00155

Introduced
2/17/12  
Introduced
2/17/12  
Refer
2/17/12  
Refer
2/17/12  
Report Pass
3/6/12  
Report Pass
3/6/12  
Refer
3/15/12  
Refer
3/15/12  
Report Pass
3/21/12  
Report Pass
3/21/12  
Refer
4/10/12  
Refer
4/10/12  
Report Pass
4/17/12  
Report Pass
4/17/12  
Report Pass
4/18/12  
Report Pass
4/18/12  
Refer
4/19/12  
Refer
4/19/12  
Report Pass
4/25/12  
Report Pass
4/25/12  
Report Pass
4/25/12  

Caption

An Act Allowing Employers To Pay Wages Using Payroll Cards.

Impact

The enactment of SB 155 is expected to significantly alter state laws governing wage payments by providing a statutory framework for payroll card usage. By allowing employers to compensate employees through these cards, the bill provides a measure of flexibility in payment methods, which could enhance convenience for certain workers. However, the law also emphasizes the necessity of ensuring that employees are not faced with fees related to the payroll card issuance or use, thus aiming to protect workers from potential financial pitfalls associated with such payment methods.

Summary

Senate Bill 155, titled 'An Act Allowing Employers To Pay Wages Using Payroll Cards,' seeks to enable employers to pay employee wages through payroll cards or direct deposit. The bill outlines specific requirements that employers must adhere to when implementing payroll cards, ensuring that employees consent to this payment method and are fully informed of associated terms and conditions. The legislation aims to modernize wage payment systems, reflecting an evolving economy that increasingly accommodates electronic transactions. This change is particularly relevant as it could facilitate wage access for employees who may not have traditional bank accounts.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 155 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with supporters highlighting the bill as a useful innovation for the modern workplace. They argue that it can streamline the wage payment process and provide employees with easier access to their funds. Conversely, there are concerns from certain stakeholders regarding the risk of hidden fees or conditions that may unfairly burden employees. The detailed requirements for employer disclosure aim to mitigate these concerns, but skepticism exists among some legislators about whether these protections will be fully effective in practice.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding the bill involves the balance between convenience and potential exploitation. While the provision for payroll cards is intended to enhance the payment process, critics worry about the complexities that might arise, particularly regarding fees that could be imposed by card issuers. Furthermore, some advocacy groups stress the importance of maintaining traditional wage payment methods, emphasizing a need to protect employees' rights to receive their wages in cash or direct deposits without additional costs. This debate reflects a broader conversation about worker rights in a changing economic landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL HB3134

VICTIMS SAFETY-ELECTRONICS

IL HB5300

WAGE PAYMENT-PAY STUBS

IL SB3208

WAGE PAYMENT-PAY STUBS

TX HB1196

Relating to the payment of wages by an employer through an electronic transfer of funds to a payroll card account.

CT SB00908

An Act Allowing Employers To Pay Wages Using Payroll Cards.

CT HB05315

An Act Allowing Employers To Pay Wages Using Payroll Cards.

LA HB340

Creates the Personal Online Account Privacy Protection Act (EN NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)

IL HB4445

VICTIMS SAFETY-ELECTRONICS