Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06387

Introduced
2/8/13  
Introduced
2/8/13  
Refer
2/8/13  
Refer
2/8/13  
Report Pass
3/13/13  
Report Pass
3/13/13  
Refer
3/25/13  
Report Pass
4/2/13  
Engrossed
5/8/13  
Report Pass
5/10/13  
Chaptered
6/11/13  
Enrolled
6/17/13  
Enrolled
6/17/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Court Operations.

Impact

The changes outlined in HB 6387 will specifically impact practices within the Superior Court, leading to alterations in how family relations matters such as custody and alimony are handled. By setting standardized fees for filing appeals, small claims, and simplified procedures for guardianship restoration, the bill aims to reduce the barriers for individuals seeking legal relief. Additionally, it modifies existing protocols for emergency custody applications, envisaging quicker responses from the judicial system in dire situations, ultimately aiming to better protect children's welfare.

Summary

House Bill 6387, titled 'An Act Concerning Court Operations,' aims to make comprehensive changes to the procedures regarding court operations, particularly related to family law and civil matters. Among its key provisions, the bill repeals and modifies several sections of the general statutes to enhance the efficiency of court processes, set uniform fees for various court filings, and streamline procedures for family-related matters such as custody and visitation rights. An important aspect is the introduction of emergency ex parte orders for custody, which allow for swift protective measures in cases of imminent danger to children.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6387 has been broadly supportive, particularly among family law advocates who recognize the need for more efficient judicial processes. However, there remains some apprehension regarding the potential for misunderstanding or misuse of the emergency custody provisions. Proponents argue that the bill enhances protections for vulnerable children, while critics express concerns about the balance of rights between parents and the state in emergency situations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of the emergency ex parte order provision, which some fear could be exploited to undermine parental rights through hasty judicial decisions. Additionally, discussions regarding the increased fees for court filings have sparked debates about accessibility to justice, emphasizing the need to ensure that legal processes remain affordable for all citizens, especially those in low-income brackets. The bill's overall impact on court accessibility and parental rights continues to be a subject of thorough discussion.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05524

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Law Revision Commission With Respect To The Alimony Statutes.

CT HB06927

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Law Revision Commission With Respect To Alimony Statutes.

CT HB07196

An Act Concerning Nonadversarial Dissolution Of Marriage.

CT SB00964

An Act Concerning Court Operations.

CT SB00428

An Act Concerning Funding Of Legal Services For The Poor.

CT SB01155

An Act Concerning Revisions To Statutes Relating To Dissolution Of Marriage, Legal Separation And Annulment.

CT HB05420

An Act Concerning The Provision Of Child Support To Children Under The Age Of Twenty-one.

CT HB05509

An Act Concerning The Payment Of Alimony And Child Support.