Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05437

Introduced
1/15/15  
Refer
1/15/15  
Refer
1/15/15  
Refer
3/13/15  
Refer
3/13/15  
Report Pass
3/27/15  
Report Pass
3/27/15  
Refer
4/7/15  
Report Pass
4/14/15  
Refer
5/5/15  
Refer
5/5/15  
Report Pass
5/11/15  
Report Pass
5/11/15  
Refer
5/14/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5437 will significantly affect the protocols and policies of police departments across Connecticut. It mandates that each law enforcement agency implement and adhere to standardized methods for recording and reporting traffic stop information electronically. This would involve documenting various details, including the race, ethnicity, and gender of individuals stopped, the nature of the violation, and the outcome of each stop, thereby improving transparency and accountability in policing.

Summary

House Bill 5437, known as the Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act, aims to enhance the prohibition against racial profiling by law enforcement in Connecticut. This bill modernizes previous regulations by defining racial profiling explicitly and outlining the responsibilities of police departments to establish written policies that prohibit traffic stops or searches based solely on racial or ethnic considerations. The law emphasizes that racial profiling constitutes discriminatory practice, helping to promote civil rights and equality under the law.

Sentiment

The discussions surrounding HB 5437 suggest a generally supportive sentiment among civil rights advocates, who view it as a crucial step towards addressing systemic issues of discrimination in law enforcement practices. However, there exists a level of contention, particularly among certain law enforcement groups concerned about the practical implications of increased oversight and data collection requirements. Advocates argue that this bill is essential for protecting the rights of marginalized communities and fostering trust between the public and police.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HB 5437 include the concerns from law enforcement agencies regarding the feasibility and implications of adhering to the new recording and reporting protocols. Some police officers fear that the bill could lead to increased scrutiny and potential backlash against law enforcement practices, while others within these agencies support the initiative as a means to enhance community relations and promote ethical policing. The bill's successful implementation is also tied to the availability of resources and training required to comply with its provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2

Recycling: solar photovoltaic modules.

CA SB1215

Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003: covered battery-embedded products.

CA AB165

Privacy: electronic communications: exclusions: local educational agencies.

CA AB608

Medical assistants.

CA AB522

State departments: investigations and hearings: administrative subpoenas.

CA AB928

Child sexual exploitation: administrative subpoenas.

CA AB358

Criminal procedure: privacy.

CA AB904

Search warrants: tracking devices.