Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06086

Introduced
1/22/15  
Introduced
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Report Pass
3/30/15  
Report Pass
3/30/15  
Refer
4/10/15  
Refer
4/10/15  
Report Pass
4/16/15  

Caption

An Act Expanding The Set-aside Program To Include Municipalities.

Impact

If enacted, HB 06086 will modify multiple sections of the existing statutes related to state and municipal contracting. Specifically, it will increase participation from small and minority contractors by mandating that municipalities adhere to the same set-aside requirements already in place for state agencies. This change is expected to have a significant positive impact on local economies by fostering a more inclusive environment for business participation in government contracting, creating potential avenues for job growth and community development.

Summary

House Bill 06086 aims to expand the existing set-aside program to include municipalities in the state of Connecticut. This program is designed to reserve a portion of public works contracts for small contractors and minority business enterprises, effectively promoting equal opportunities in contracting for entities that may have historically been underrepresented. The bill seeks to secure at least twenty-five percent of total contract value for award to these groups, thus enhancing economic prospects for small businesses within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06086 appears to be largely positive among proponents, who view it as a necessary step towards equity in government contracting. Supporters argue that the bill addresses systemic barriers faced by small and minority-owned businesses, thus supporting diversity and fairness in economic opportunities. However, there could be concerns regarding the administrative capacity of municipalities to implement these changes effectively, with opponents possibly raising issues about the adequacy of resources to manage the expanded requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely stem from concerns about the potential for increased bureaucracy and the feasibility of compliance from smaller municipalities. Critics may argue that while the intentions of the bill are good, the operational burden placed on cities and towns could hinder their ability to manage contracts efficiently. Furthermore, ensuring that the set-aside program is enforced effectively will require oversight and commitment from both state and municipal entities, which may be a logistical challenge.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00452

An Act Implementing The Initial Findings Of The Disparity Study Concerning The Minority Business Set-aside Program.

CA AB1809

Disabled veteran business enterprises.

CA SB1179

Public contracts: Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program.

CA AB1574

Public contracts: small business liaisons and advocates and disabled veteran business enterprises: preferences.

CA SB588

Public contracts: Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program.

CT HB05265

An Act Requiring The Prompt Payment Of Contractors.

CT SB00430

An Act Concerning The State Fleet And Mileage, Fuel And Emission Standards, The Certification Of Minority Business Enterprises And Preference For A Bond Guaranty Program.

CT SB00831

An Act Eliminating The Municipal Exemption From The Contract Compliance Requirements In State Contracts.