Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00892

Introduced
2/9/15  
Introduced
2/9/15  
Refer
2/9/15  
Report Pass
2/19/15  
Report Pass
2/19/15  
Refer
2/27/15  
Refer
2/27/15  
Report Pass
3/5/15  
Report Pass
3/5/15  
Refer
4/8/15  
Report Pass
4/14/15  
Report Pass
4/14/15  
Report Pass
4/15/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Report Pass
5/7/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Housing Developments Within Incentive Housing Zones.

Impact

By implementing SB00892, municipalities would gain the capability to establish incentive housing zones that adhere to state density mandates, effectively streamlining the approval process for new housing developments. The bill promises to enhance the housing stock in municipalities, especially in areas where the housing has traditionally been scarce, thereby aiming to alleviate some of the pressures in the housing market. However, it also restricts local governments' flexibility in zoning, as municipalities may lose the ability to enact ordinances that diverge from the state-set standards.

Summary

SB00892, known as the Act Concerning Housing Developments Within Incentive Housing Zones, seeks to establish and regulate incentive housing zones within municipalities to promote affordable housing development. The bill outlines specific density requirements for residential construction, such as a minimum of six units per acre for single-family homes and twenty units for multifamily housing. This legislative measure aims to address housing shortages by providing a framework that enables municipalities to increase housing supply while ensuring that developments meet certain state guidelines.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB00892 appears to be mixed. Supporters, particularly housing advocates and some local government officials, argue that the bill is a crucial step toward fostering a more inclusive housing market that serves low-income families. Conversely, detractors express concern over the loss of local control in zoning matters, fearing that the imposition of statewide standards may overlook unique local needs and priorities. This division highlights the ongoing tension between state intervention and local governance in addressing housing issues.

Contention

Key points of contention involve the balance between necessary housing development and the rights of municipalities to govern local land use. Critics argue that SB00892 could undermine local zoning laws, potentially leading to developments that may not align with community values or infrastructure capacities. Proponents contend that the increased housing density and state-level standardization are essential for meeting the urgent demand for affordable housing, arguing that such measures can ultimately benefit communities by addressing housing shortages effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1813

Insurance.

MN SF2706

2024 children, youth, and families recodification follow-up and technical changes

MN HF2551

Follow-up to 2024 children, youth, and families recodification; technical changes made.

CA SB1361

Department of Business Oversight: administration.

MN SF626

Department of Direct Care and Treatment establishment

CA SB355

Judgment debtor employers: Employment Development Department.

MN HF2037

Department of Direct Care and Treatment established, commissioner established to oversee department, and direct care and treatment executive board repealed.

MN SF3138

Department of Human reporting and licensing changes implementation for provider licensing and reporting hub