Connecticut Senate Bill SB00197

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/16
• Refer: 2/18/16
• Report Pass: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/21/16
• Refer: 4/6/16
• Report Pass: 4/11/16
• Report Pass: 4/12/16
• Engrossed: 4/20/16
• Report Pass: 4/22/16

Caption

An Act Concerning Veterans, Discriminatory Practices And Orders Of The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities In Employment Discrimination Cases.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would significantly impact state laws governing human rights and labor practices. It aims to eliminate discrimination based on race, color, gender identity, sexual orientation, and veteran status in employment scenarios. Moreover, the bill explicitly holds state agencies accountable for adhering to these non-discrimination policies while also promoting equal access to state contracts and opportunities. The provisions aim to create a more inclusive environment which could potentially lead to better job outcomes for various demographic groups.

Summary

SB00197, also known as An Act Concerning Veterans, Discriminatory Practices And Orders Of The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities In Employment Discrimination Cases, focuses on strengthening protections against discriminatory practices, particularly in employment and housing. The bill proposes amendments to existing laws to ensure that individuals across various protected classes, including veterans, receive equal treatment and opportunities. The revisions aim to clarify and reinforce the responsibilities of state agencies and organizations concerning non-discriminatory practices in their operations and services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00197 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among advocates for veterans and human rights. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary measure to promote equality and prevent discrimination, recognizing the unique challenges faced by veterans and others affected by discriminatory practices. Some concerns were raised about the effectiveness of the enforcement of these provisions, indicating a need for continuous dialogue regarding the implementation and monitoring of the bill's measures.

Contention

While most discussions favored the bill, some points of contention emerged regarding the extent of enforcement and the potential burden on small businesses or organizations in compliance with the new regulations. Critics may highlight the fear of increased litigation or administrative challenges associated with proving compliance. Nonetheless, proponents argue that such measures are essential to safeguard human rights and mitigate discrimination in the workforce.