Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00227

Introduced
2/24/16  
Refer
2/24/16  
Refer
2/24/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Refer
3/28/16  
Refer
3/28/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Refer
4/13/16  
Refer
4/13/16  
Report Pass
4/15/16  
Report Pass
4/15/16  
Report Pass
4/19/16  
Report Pass
4/19/16  
Engrossed
4/27/16  
Engrossed
4/27/16  
Report Pass
4/29/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Cecil's Law.

Impact

If enacted, Cecil's Law will amend existing wildlife protection regulations and enhance the penalties associated with violations. Anyone found in breach of this law will face felony charges, fines reaching up to ten thousand dollars, and possible imprisonment for up to two years. By providing stringent penalties, the law hopes to deter illegal practices that threaten these iconic species and enforce stricter compliance among individuals and organizations within the state. Furthermore, it empowers law enforcement officers to seize and hold illegal specimens pending criminal proceedings.

Summary

SB00227, also known as Cecil's Law, aims to impose strict regulations against the import, sale, and possession of certain protected species, specifically the big five African species: African elephants, lions, leopards, black rhinoceroses, and white rhinoceroses. The bill enforces a statewide prohibition on any activities that involve these species unless specific conditions are met, such as ownership prior to the passage of the law or for educational purposes in accredited institutions. This legislation signifies a robust approach towards wildlife conservation and reflects rising concerns over poaching and illegal wildlife trade.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00227 tends to be supportive among conservationists, animal rights groups, and the general public concerned about wildlife preservation. Proponents champion the bill as a necessary measure to safeguard endangered species and combat the growing threats from illegal wildlife trade. However, conversations may reflect some apprehension from individuals and entities that currently own such specimens, fearing the implications of potential confiscation or loss of personal property rights.

Contention

Despite its intentions, the law raises points of contention regarding its application and the potential impact on legal owners of specimens derived from these species. Critics point out that the bill does allow exceptions under specific circumstances such as educational institutions and certified collections, yet concerns remain about the enforcement process. Navigating the balance between enforcement and the rights of lawful owners, alongside the complexities of wildlife conservation, remains a central theme in discussions pertaining to SB00227.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0140

Law Enforcement DNA Amendments

CA SB625

Newborn screening: genetic diseases: blood samples collected.

TX SB852

Relating to availability of certain property and casualty insurance forms.

IL HB1044

CD CORR DNA SAMPLE

TX HB1399

Relating to electronic availability of certain property and casualty insurance forms.

CA SB442

State parks: resource exploitation exceptions: commercialization of investigation results.

IL HB3352

CD CORR DNA SAMPLE

HI HB1653

Relating To Aquatic Resources.