Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06168

Introduced
1/25/19  
Introduced
1/25/19  
Refer
1/25/19  
Refer
1/25/19  
Report Pass
2/20/19  
Report Pass
2/20/19  
Refer
2/27/19  
Refer
2/27/19  
Report Pass
3/5/19  

Caption

An Act Establishing A Task Force To Study A Conserved Person's Right To Interact With Others.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6168 would enhance the legal framework surrounding conservatorships by ensuring that individuals retain their right to social interaction. This aligns with broader legislative trends aimed at protecting the rights of vulnerable populations, such as those with disabilities or mental health issues. The task force will examine existing laws and propose adjustments to better reflect the needs and rights of conserved persons. This could reshape community standards and practices regarding conservatorship, encouraging a more humane and rights-based approach.

Summary

House Bill 6168 aims to establish a task force dedicated to studying the rights of individuals under conservatorship, specifically focusing on their ability to interact with others. The bill recognizes the challenges faced by conserved persons in maintaining relationships while ensuring safety and minimizing burdens on their conservators. By convening experts and stakeholders, the task force is expected to explore the most appropriate and least restrictive measures to facilitate social interactions for conserved individuals under state law.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6168 is generally supportive, especially among advocacy groups focused on the rights of individuals with disabilities. Proponents believe that studying the interaction rights of conserved persons is a positive step towards inclusivity and respect for personal relationships. However, there may be concerns about the practical implications of the task force's recommendations, as some may worry about safeguarding procedures for those under conservatorship.

Contention

Key points of contention may revolve around the balance between ensuring personal freedoms for conserved individuals and the responsibilities of conservators. There could be debate on what constitutes the 'least restrictive means' in ensuring safety during interactions, as well as potential opposition from conservators who fear that increased rights for conserved persons could lead to conflicts in managing their responsibilities. The outcomes of the task force could lead to significant changes in the conservatorship statutes, thus affecting how conservators operate within the community.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.