Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07222

Introduced
2/25/19  
Refer
2/25/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Engrossed
5/15/19  
Engrossed
5/15/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Duties Of The Office Of The Attorney General.

Impact

If enacted, HB 07222 would significantly impact the enforcement dynamics of state laws by providing the Attorney General with additional tools to address violations quickly and effectively. The bill introduces provisions for civil penalties, including the potential for treble damages and attorney's fees, which could serve as a deterrent against violations. This could lead to heightened scrutiny for entities that may engage in unlawful practices that infringe on citizens' rights, thereby fostering a more accountable environment.

Summary

House Bill 07222 aims to enhance the powers and duties of the Attorney General's Office by expanding its authority to investigate alleged violations of certain statutes. Specifically, the bill allows the Attorney General to issue subpoenas, gather evidence, and bring civil actions on behalf of individuals whose rights have been infringed, particularly under laws related to public safety and personal rights. The intent is to empower the Attorney General to act more decisively in protecting the interests of residents in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 07222 appears to be mixed, with proponents viewing it as a necessary step toward strengthening the oversight and enforcement capabilities of the Attorney General's office. They argue that it enhances protections for individuals against violations of their rights. However, there are concerns among some lawmakers and advocacy groups about the implications of expanding governmental powers and the potential for overreach in enforcement actions, highlighting the need for careful oversight in its implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between empowering the Attorney General and ensuring that such powers are not misused. Critics fear that the broad investigatory powers could lead to unnecessary legal actions against innocent parties, while proponents maintain that the safeguards built into the bill—such as ensuring that individuals maintain the right to file their own actions under existing statutes—will help mitigate these concerns. Furthermore, the debate emphasizes varying perspectives on the role of the state in protecting individual rights versus the potential for state overreach.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05269

An Act Concerning Noncompete Agreements.

CT HB05382

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Office Of The Child Advocate.

CT HB05283

An Act Concerning The Classification Of Parole Officers As Peace Officers.

CT HB05242

An Act Concerning The Collateral Consequences Of Criminal Records On Housing Opportunities.

CT HB05144

An Act Concerning The Assignment Of Certain Liens.

CT HB05150

An Act Concerning Cannabis And Hemp Regulation.

CT HB05288

An Act Aligning State Law With Federal Law Concerning Service Animals.

CT HB05161

An Act Concerning Child Sexual Abuse Material.

CT HB05236

An Act Concerning Recommendations By The Department Of Consumer Protection.

CT HB05197

An Act Concerning Social Workers.

Similar Bills

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

IL SB3671

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB1163

Minors: power of attorney to care for a minor child.

CA SB1109

Adoption.

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

CA AB2083

Public utilities: rates.

CA AB894

Attorney General: directors and employees: exemption from civil service.