California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2083

Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Report Pass
5/18/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/23/22  
Refer
6/27/22  
Refer
6/27/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Chaptered
9/28/22  
Chaptered
9/28/22  

Caption

Public utilities: rates.

Impact

The bill has significant implications on state laws regarding transportation and environmental regulations. If enacted, AB2083 would reshape funding allocations for transportation projects, prioritizing those that adhere to sustainability standards. This shift aligns with broader state goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and meeting climate action targets. Critics point out, however, that the bill could lead to increased costs for municipalities, potentially diverting funds from other important services.

Summary

AB2083 seeks to enhance transportation infrastructure across the state by promoting sustainable practices and improving public transit systems. The bill focuses on creating a framework that encourages the development of green transportation options, such as electric public transit vehicles and bicycle lanes. Supporters assert that these initiatives are crucial for reducing the carbon footprint of the state's transportation sector, while simultaneously addressing concerns about traffic congestion in urban areas.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB2083 is mixed. Proponents, including environmental advocates and urban planners, view the bill as a necessary step towards modernizing the state's transport systems while fostering environmental responsibility. They argue that investing in green initiatives is essential for future sustainability. Conversely, some lawmakers and local government officials express concerns over the feasibility of the funding mechanisms, claiming that the bill might impose unrealistic expectations on cities already facing budget constraints.

Contention

A notable point of contention is whether the bill adequately addresses the needs of rural areas, which may not have the same capacity to implement extensive public transit systems as urban centers. Opponents argue that while the bill's intentions are commendable, it might inadvertently widen the gap between urban and rural transportation capabilities. The debate illustrates the challenge of creating a comprehensive transportation law that serves both densely populated cities and less populated regions equitably.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB487

Insurance.

CA AB931

State Bar Act: consumer legal funding.

CA AB1495

Civil liability: sexual abuse: children.

CA SB1394

Petitions: compensation for signatures.

CA SB761

Department of Justice: civil rights investigations.

CA AB378

Public officials.

CA AB1388

Law enforcement: settlement agreements.

CA AB2917

Firearms: restraining orders.