Connecticut House Bill HB07293

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/19
• Refer: 3/5/19
• Report Pass: 3/25/19
• Refer: 4/5/19
• Report Pass: 4/11/19

Caption

An Act Concerning The Redevelopment Of Certain Solid Waste Management Facilities.

Impact

If approved, HB 07293 would significantly change existing statutes related to solid waste management in the state. The bill directs the Commissioner to consider various factors including consistency with state solid waste management plans and economic implications for municipalities. Additionally, it emphasizes public review, allowing community members to voice their opinions on proposed feasibility studies, which suggests an effort to maintain transparency throughout the process.

Summary

House Bill 07293, titled 'An Act Concerning the Redevelopment of Certain Solid Waste Management Facilities,' is aimed at modernizing how Connecticut manages its waste through the engagement of private sector solutions. Specifically, the bill mandates that the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection issue requests for proposals for solid waste management services. The focus is on not only recycling and reuse but also on newer solutions like energy recovery. The bill outlines a clear framework for selecting a proposal, ensuring that sustainability and community impacts are considered during the review process.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill is cautiously optimistic, particularly among proponents who see it as a necessary move towards innovative waste management solutions. Supporters argue that by encouraging public-private partnerships, the state can enhance efficiency and sustainability. However, there are reservations among some community groups and local officials who are concerned about the implications of privatizing services that have traditionally been managed locally, noting potential risks to public accountability and local job security.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HB 07293 include fears regarding the effectiveness of privatization in managing solid waste and the potential costs associated with contracts that may prioritize profit over public interest. Opponents argue that while the proposal aims to revitalize the solid waste management system, there is a risk that essential community controls may be lost, leading to unexpected local repercussions. The debate reflects broader concerns about environmental impacts and resource allocation, particularly in a context where residents are demanding greater accountability in environmental governance.