Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00020

Introduced
1/15/19  
Refer
1/15/19  
Refer
1/15/19  
Refer
2/7/19  
Refer
2/7/19  
Report Pass
2/25/19  
Refer
3/6/19  
Refer
3/6/19  
Report Pass
3/12/19  
Refer
4/17/19  
Report Pass
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Engrossed
5/10/19  
Engrossed
5/10/19  

Caption

An Act Prohibiting The Import, Sale And Possession Of African Elephants, Lions, Leopards, Black Rhinoceros, White Rhinoceros And Giraffes.

Impact

The enactment of SB 20 would amend existing state laws pertaining to wildlife and environmental protection. By criminalizing the import and trade of these six African species, the state aims to deter illegal trafficking and provide law enforcement agencies with clear authority to seize contraband. This bill also allows for the enforcement of additional penalties, such as property forfeiture, for individuals caught in violation of its provisions. Furthermore, it delineates exceptions for legally possessed specimens under specific conditions, reflecting a balance between conservation efforts and current lawful ownership.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 20 seeks to prohibit the import, sale, and possession of six significant African species: African elephants, lions, leopards, black rhinoceros, white rhinoceros, and giraffes. This bill addresses the increasing concerns over wildlife trafficking and aims to strengthen protections for these endangered species. Under this legislation, any violation would be classified as a felony, with penalties reaching up to $10,000 in fines and two years of imprisonment. This legislative measure highlights a commitment to conservation and the preservation of biodiversity within the state.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment towards SB 20 among lawmakers and conservation advocates is positive, emphasizing the moral and ethical responsibility to protect endangered wildlife. Supporters view the bill as a proactive measure against wildlife crime and as a testament to the state’s dedication to global conservation efforts. Conversely, a few critics expressed concerns regarding how the bill might affect individuals who may legally possess such species, particularly in terms of adequately accommodating their current ownership scenarios without undue hardship.

Contention

While support for the bill is significant, there are notable points of contention. Critics have raised fears about the implementation and enforcement of the law, particularly regarding the definition of legal possession and the bureaucratic challenges that may arise in certifying ownership. Ensuring that existing collections, such as those in museums or held by private owners, are exempt from the new regulations poses logistical challenges that the bill will need to address effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0140

Law Enforcement DNA Amendments

CA SB625

Newborn screening: genetic diseases: blood samples collected.

TX SB852

Relating to availability of certain property and casualty insurance forms.

TX HB1399

Relating to electronic availability of certain property and casualty insurance forms.

IL HB1044

CD CORR DNA SAMPLE

CA SB442

State parks: resource exploitation exceptions: commercialization of investigation results.

IL HB3352

CD CORR DNA SAMPLE

HI HB1653

Relating To Aquatic Resources.