Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06607

Introduced
3/10/21  
Introduced
3/10/21  
Refer
3/10/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Report Pass
4/9/21  
Report Pass
4/9/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Engrossed
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/24/21  
Report Pass
5/24/21  
Passed
6/7/21  
Passed
6/7/21  
Chaptered
6/23/21  
Chaptered
6/23/21  
Enrolled
6/24/21  
Enrolled
6/24/21  

Caption

An Act Incentivizing The Adoption Of Cybersecurity Standards For Businesses.

Impact

The implications of HB 6607 are numerous, particularly for businesses that handle personal data. By incentivizing the adoption of cybersecurity measures, the bill aims to fortify critical protections against data breaches, thereby enhancing consumer trust. Additionally, it seeks to reduce the financial liability faced by businesses in the event of a data breach, encouraging them to invest in cybersecurity without the fear of overwhelming punitive costs if breaches occur despite their compliance with established standards.

Summary

House Bill 6607, known as An Act Incentivizing The Adoption Of Cybersecurity Standards For Businesses, seeks to enhance cybersecurity measures among businesses in the state. This bill aims to protect personal information and restricted information by encouraging businesses to implement reasonable cybersecurity controls. The legislation stipulates that a business that adheres to these standards will not be liable for punitive damages in the event of a data breach, provided they have established a robust cybersecurity framework in accordance with recognized industry guidelines. The law is set to take effect on October 1, 2021.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears to be overwhelmingly positive, particularly among legislators and businesses that prioritize cyber protection. Stakeholders argue that the introduction of such cybersecurity standards is necessary to safeguard sensitive information and maintain confidence in digital transactions. However, there may be some concerns regarding the adequacy of the defined safeguards and the practical challenges smaller enterprises might face in meeting these new requirements.

Contention

Notably, there are potential points of contention, including the clarity of what constitutes 'reasonable cybersecurity controls' and how businesses might interpret these guidelines. Critics argue that while protection against punitive damages is a step forward, it may inadvertently encourage lax practices if businesses interpret the law as a blank check to delay compliance or lower investment in cybersecurity. Discussions in legislative circles emphasize the need for a balance between fostering business adaptability and ensuring stringent protective measures for consumer data.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2695

California State University: Cybersecurity Regional Alliances and Multistakeholder Partnerships Pilot Program.

CA AB979

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: artificial intelligence.

CA SB265

Cybersecurity preparedness: critical infrastructure sectors.

CA SB844

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: cybersecurity improvement: reports.

NJ S3835

Establishes Office of Cybersecurity Infrastructure.

CA AB2507

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: representatives.

CA AB1306

California Cybersecurity Integration Center.

CA AB327

COVID-19 vaccination status: prohibition on required disclosure.