Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00122

Introduced
1/12/21  
Introduced
1/12/21  
Refer
1/12/21  
Refer
1/12/21  
Refer
2/4/21  
Refer
2/4/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Refer
3/29/21  
Refer
3/29/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Report Pass
5/14/21  

Caption

An Act Establishing A Unit Within The Division Of State Police To Investigate Hate Crimes And Criminal Acts Committed By Extremist Groups.

Impact

The bill will significantly impact how hate crimes are monitored, reported, and investigated in the state. It mandates that any law enforcement unit report alleged bias-motivated crimes to the newly established Investigative Unit within a defined timeframe. Additionally, it requires the unit to compile and maintain data on hate crimes and extremist activities, which will inform future policy decisions and potentially lead to more robust strategies for crime prevention and law enforcement training.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 122 aims to establish a dedicated unit within the Division of State Police to investigate hate crimes and criminal acts committed by extremist groups. This legislation responds to the increasing concerns regarding violence and crime driven by bigotry or bias, addressing the need for specialized investigative resources to better handle such pressing issues. By implementing this unit, the state aims to enhance its capability to prevent, investigate, and analyze crimes that are motivated by hatred or prejudice, ensuring that law enforcement can respond effectively to these challenges.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be largely positive, reflecting a consensus on the necessity to address hate crimes and the activities of extremist groups. Supporters of the bill, including various advocacy organizations and lawmakers, advocate for stronger measures to protect vulnerable communities from hate-driven violence. However, there may also be concerns regarding the potential overreach of law enforcement powers, which some critics argue could lead to unnecessary surveillance and discrimination against certain groups.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions regarding SB00122 include the definition of an 'extremist' and how broadly or narrowly the Investigative Unit can interpret its mandate. Critics worry that an expansive interpretation could lead to the profiling of specific communities or individuals based on their beliefs or identities. Furthermore, there are discussions on the implications of data collection and reporting processes, raising questions about privacy rights and the potential misuse of information gathered by law enforcement.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S1791

Requires Attorney General to establish and maintain domestic extremist organization database.

CT SB00410

An Act Establishing A Unit Within The Division Of State Police To Investigate Hate Crimes And Criminal Acts Committed By Extremist Groups.

TX HCR52

Urging Congress to pass House Resolution 61, the Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023.

HI HR23

Declaring Disinformation And Digital Hate Speech As Threats To Democracy And Urging Departments And Agencies To Address These Threats.

HI HCR34

Declaring Disinformation And Digital Hate Speech As Threats To Democracy And Urging Departments And Agencies To Address These Threats.

MD HB1435

Public Safety - Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission - Prohibition Against Certain Affiliation or Support by Police Officers

MD HB524

Public Safety - Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission - Prohibition Against Certain Affiliation or Support by Police Officers

MD HB88

Public Safety – Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission – Prohibition Against Certain Affiliation or Support by Police Officers