Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00152

Introduced
1/15/21  
Refer
1/15/21  
Refer
1/15/21  
Refer
3/3/21  
Report Pass
3/9/21  
Refer
3/19/21  
Refer
3/19/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Engrossed
4/28/21  
Report Pass
4/29/21  
Report Pass
4/29/21  
Passed
6/7/21  
Passed
6/7/21  
Chaptered
6/23/21  
Enrolled
6/24/21  
Passed
7/7/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning Electronic Delivery Tickets For Gasoline, Kerosene, Fuel Oils Or Similar Substances.

Impact

The implementation of SB00152 is set to amend existing statutes related to the sale and distribution of fuels in the state. By permitting electronic tickets, the bill paves the way for technology integration in fuel deliveries, potentially leading to reduced transaction times and operational costs for businesses involved in fuel distribution. Furthermore, the requirement for sellers to retain an electronic record of delivery tickets for a minimum of twelve months aims to enhance transparency and accountability within the industry, which could positively impact consumer confidence.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 152, also known as Public Act No. 21-126, is focused on modernizing the regulations surrounding the delivery of gasoline, kerosene, and other fuel oils. The bill allows for the use of electronic delivery tickets instead of traditional printed tickets, provided that there is mutual agreement between the seller and the purchaser. This change is designed to streamline the delivery process and reduce paperwork, facilitating a more efficient way of tracking fuel deliveries. The legal framework around the measurement and reporting of fuel sales is maintained, ensuring that standards are upheld for accountability.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB00152 seems to be favorable, especially among industry stakeholders who view the adoption of electronic delivery tickets as a progressive step that aligns with current technological advancements. Proponents argue that the bill will not only ease the burden of compliance for businesses but also support local economies by facilitating more efficient transactions. However, there remains a cautious outlook regarding how this shift might affect smaller sellers or those with less technological capability, raising concerns about equitable access to the new system.

Contention

While the bill has received broad support, there are points of contention regarding the transition to electronic tickets. Some critics echo fears about fraud and data management, asserting that without stringent checks, the risk of inaccuracies may increase with electronic systems. Furthermore, the need for sellers to be compliant with the new electronic regulations may pose challenges for smaller operators who may not have the resources to adapt swiftly. These concerns point to a need for proper guidance and support during the implementation phase to ensure that the changes benefit all parties involved.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S2273

Requires delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A5213

Requires delivery network companies to maintain automobile insurance.

NJ A2809

Requires delivery network companies to maintain automobile insurance.

NJ S486

Requires delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A3594

Requires food delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

NJ A2793

Requires food delivery network company to maintain certain automobile insurance.

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB1360

Third-party food delivery.