Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HJ00035 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-
2-
3-LCO \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2022HJ-00035-R01-
4-HB.docx
5-1 of 2
6-
7-General Assembly Substitute House Joint
8-Resolution No. 35
9-February Session, 2022
101
112
123
4+LCO No. 2302 1 of 1
135
14-RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS
15-AGAINST THE STATE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 53 OF THE
16-GENERAL STATUTES.
6+General Assembly House Joint
7+ Resolution No. 35
8+February Session, 2022
9+LCO No. 2302
10+
11+
12+Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY
13+
14+
15+Introduced by:
16+(JUD)
17+
18+
19+
20+RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS
21+COMMISSIONER TO DENY THE CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE OF
22+DARLENE WALKER.
1723 Resolved by this Assembly:
1824
19-Section 1. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 1
20-24425 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 2
25+That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24425 of 1
26+said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in 2
2127 excess of twenty thousand dollars of Darlene Walker, is confirmed. 3
22-Sec. 2. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 4
23-25348 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 5
24-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Carlton Wallace, is confirmed. 6
25-Sec. 3. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 7
26-25746 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 8
27-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Patrick Batchelor, is confirmed. 9
28-Sec. 4. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 10
29-25461 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 11
30-excess of twenty thousand dollars of William Billington, is confirmed. 12
31-Sec. 5. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 13
32-25822 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 14
33-excess of fifty thousand dollars of Jean Conquistador, is confirmed. 15 Substitute House Joint Resolution No. 35
34-
35-
36-LCO {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2022HJ-00035-
37-R01-HB.docx }
38-2 of 3
39-
40-Sec. 6. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 16
41-25871 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 17
42-excess of fifty thousand dollars of William Jackson, is confirmed. 18
43-Sec. 7. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 19
44-23975 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 20
45-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Clement and Lori Langlois, is 21
46-confirmed. 22
47-Sec. 8. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23
48-23977 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 24
49-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Kevin McBreairty, is confirmed. 25
50-Sec. 9. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 26
51-23978 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 27
52-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Wayne McBreairty, is confirmed. 28
53-Sec. 10. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 29
54-24901 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 30
55-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Keith Anderson, is confirmed. 31
56-Sec. 11. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 32
57-23582 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 33
58-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Khadija Barnoussi, is confirmed. 34
59-Sec. 12. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 35
60-24472 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 36
61-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Toni Camby, is confirmed. 37
62-Sec. 13. That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 38
63-25326 of said commissioner, involving the claim against the state in 39
64-excess of twenty thousand dollars of Richard Reynolds, is confirmed. 40
65-Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
66-In Section 1, the language concerning the denial of the claim was
67-changed to "involving the claim against the state" for consistency.
68-
69- Substitute House Joint Resolution No. 35
70-
71-
72-LCO {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2022HJ-00035-
73-R01-HB.docx }
74-3 of 3
75-
76-JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
77-