1 | 1 | | |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | HM 641 2022 |
---|
4 | 4 | | |
---|
5 | 5 | | |
---|
6 | 6 | | |
---|
7 | 7 | | CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. |
---|
8 | 8 | | hm0641-00 |
---|
9 | 9 | | Page 1 of 3 |
---|
10 | 10 | | F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S |
---|
11 | 11 | | R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S |
---|
12 | 12 | | |
---|
13 | 13 | | House Memorial 1 |
---|
14 | 14 | | A memorial to the Congress of the United States, 2 |
---|
15 | 15 | | urging Congress to oppose the intrusive Internal 3 |
---|
16 | 16 | | Revenue Service reporting requirements placed on 4 |
---|
17 | 17 | | financial institutions included in the Biden 5 |
---|
18 | 18 | | administration's tax increase proposal. 6 |
---|
19 | 19 | | 7 |
---|
20 | 20 | | WHEREAS, the Biden administration's tax increase proposal 8 |
---|
21 | 21 | | for fiscal year 2022 includes a number of provisions that would 9 |
---|
22 | 22 | | place undue burdens on financial institutions, small businesses, 10 |
---|
23 | 23 | | and law-abiding citizens, and 11 |
---|
24 | 24 | | WHEREAS, one proposal seeks to increase tax payment 12 |
---|
25 | 25 | | enforcement measures by requiring peer -to-peer payment 13 |
---|
26 | 26 | | transaction applications as well as financial institutions to 14 |
---|
27 | 27 | | annually report aggregated data on all accou nt inflows and 15 |
---|
28 | 28 | | outflows of $10,000 or more to the Internal Revenue Service 16 |
---|
29 | 29 | | (IRS), and 17 |
---|
30 | 30 | | WHEREAS, the reports would also disclose whether 18 |
---|
31 | 31 | | transactions involved physical cash, foreign accounts, or 19 |
---|
32 | 32 | | transfers between accounts with the same owner, negatively 20 |
---|
33 | 33 | | impacting the privacy rights of Americans, compliance costs, and 21 |
---|
34 | 34 | | low-income communities, and 22 |
---|
35 | 35 | | WHEREAS, the proposal's $10,000 threshold for reporting 23 |
---|
36 | 36 | | would ensnare many active financial institution accounts, 24 |
---|
37 | 37 | | including those owned by individuals and small bus inesses, 25 |
---|
38 | 38 | | |
---|
39 | 39 | | HM 641 2022 |
---|
40 | 40 | | |
---|
41 | 41 | | |
---|
42 | 42 | | |
---|
43 | 43 | | CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. |
---|
44 | 44 | | hm0641-00 |
---|
45 | 45 | | Page 2 of 3 |
---|
46 | 46 | | F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S |
---|
47 | 47 | | R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S |
---|
48 | 48 | | |
---|
49 | 49 | | requiring the financial data of the majority of those accounts 26 |
---|
50 | 50 | | to be sent to the IRS, an agency that experiences more than one 27 |
---|
51 | 51 | | billion cyberattacks each year, and 28 |
---|
52 | 52 | | WHEREAS, a June 2021 ProPublica article revealed a massive 29 |
---|
53 | 53 | | leak of tax return data from the IRS, demonstrating that the 30 |
---|
54 | 54 | | agency is unable or unwilling to protect taxpayer information, 31 |
---|
55 | 55 | | and given its many vulnerabilities in cybersecurity, the IRS 32 |
---|
56 | 56 | | should not be trusted with more private information, and 33 |
---|
57 | 57 | | WHEREAS, by holding financial institu tions responsible for 34 |
---|
58 | 58 | | data collection and reporting, the proposal would force 35 |
---|
59 | 59 | | financial institutions to increase spending on additional 36 |
---|
60 | 60 | | staffing, technology, and other resources, which could then be 37 |
---|
61 | 61 | | passed on to the depositors, thus burdening tax -compliant 38 |
---|
62 | 62 | | citizens and small businesses, and 39 |
---|
63 | 63 | | WHEREAS, the Biden administration's tax increase proposal 40 |
---|
64 | 64 | | fails to consider cybersecurity risks and unjust burdens on law -41 |
---|
65 | 65 | | abiding citizens, financial institutions, and small businesses, 42 |
---|
66 | 66 | | and the United States Congress sh ould oppose this unprecedented 43 |
---|
67 | 67 | | intrusion into the privacy rights of Americans, NOW, THEREFORE, 44 |
---|
68 | 68 | | 45 |
---|
69 | 69 | | Be It Resolved by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 46 |
---|
70 | 70 | | 47 |
---|
71 | 71 | | That the Congress of the United States is urged to oppose 48 |
---|
72 | 72 | | the intrusive Internal Revenue Servic e reporting requirements 49 |
---|
73 | 73 | | |
---|
74 | 74 | | HM 641 2022 |
---|
75 | 75 | | |
---|
76 | 76 | | |
---|
77 | 77 | | |
---|
78 | 78 | | CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. |
---|
79 | 79 | | hm0641-00 |
---|
80 | 80 | | Page 3 of 3 |
---|
81 | 81 | | F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S |
---|
82 | 82 | | R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S |
---|
83 | 83 | | |
---|
84 | 84 | | placed on financial institutions included in the Biden 50 |
---|
85 | 85 | | administration's tax increase proposal. 51 |
---|
86 | 86 | | BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be 52 |
---|
87 | 87 | | dispatched to the President of the United States, to the 53 |
---|
88 | 88 | | President of the United States Senate, to the Speaker of the 54 |
---|
89 | 89 | | United States House of Representatives, and to each member of 55 |
---|
90 | 90 | | the Florida delegation to the United States Congress. 56 |
---|