Florida 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0761

Introduced
2/10/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Engrossed
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Engrossed
5/2/23  
Enrolled
5/2/23  
Passed
5/25/23  

Caption

Telephone Solicitation

Impact

The passage of HB 761 would require significant changes to how businesses conduct telemarketing and communication with potential customers. It mandates that businesses obtain a clear and documented consent from individuals before they can initiate calls or send messages, which may shift the responsibility towards businesses to ensure compliance. This could potentially lead to a decrease in unsolicited calls and texts, giving consumers more control over their contact preferences and mitigating issues related to spam communications.

Summary

House Bill 761 aims to strengthen consumer protections regarding telephone solicitations by formalizing the requirement for prior express written consent from individuals before making telephonic sales calls or sending text message solicitations. This legislation revises existing definitions and establishes new conditions under which civil actions for unsolicited communications can be pursued. It addresses the increasing concern over unsolicited telemarketing practices, particularly those involving automated systems for dialing or delivering pre-recorded messages.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 761 appears to be largely positive from consumer advocacy groups and individuals who have experienced the annoyances of unsolicited telemarketing calls. Advocates argue that this bill is an important step toward empowering consumers and providing them with a right to refuse unwanted communication. However, some business representatives express concerns that the legislation may overly complicate outreach strategies and increase operational costs for legitimate businesses looking to connect with potential customers.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding the bill include potential challenges related to enforcement and the burden of compliance on businesses. Opponents argue that the requirement for written consent could be impractical for many legitimate telemarketing operations and could stifle effective marketing practices. Furthermore, there are discussions regarding the precise definitions of consent and how those definitions could impact not only telemarketing practices but also the broader landscape of consumer outreach and engagement.

Companion Bills

FL S1308

Similar To Telephone Solicitation

Similar Bills

VA SB1339

Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act; telephone solicitations by text message, effective date.

CA AB1231

Telecommunications: combining lifeline, federal lifeline, and federal Affordable Connectivity Program subsidies.

NC H936

Robocall Solicitation Modifications

CA SB716

Lifeline program: broadband internet access service.

CA AB1588

Telecommunications: duties of local exchange carriers.

CA AB2808

Primary ticket sellers.

CA AB2885

False campaign speech and online platform disclosures.

CA SB1272

Crimes: intercepting telephone communications.