Florida 2024 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0353

Introduced
11/7/23  
Refer
11/22/23  
Introduced
11/7/23  
Refer
11/22/23  
Refer
11/22/23  
Engrossed
2/22/24  
Refer
11/22/23  
Refer
2/23/24  
Engrossed
2/22/24  
Engrossed
3/4/24  
Refer
2/23/24  
Engrossed
3/4/24  
Passed
4/15/24  
Enrolled
3/4/24  
Chaptered
4/16/24  
Passed
4/15/24  

Caption

Alternative Headquarters for District Court Judges

Impact

The legislative modifications proposed in HB 353 will adjust existing statutes related to judicial operations and reimbursements. The bill broadens the definition of a judge's official headquarters, permitting judges to designate a private chamber in nearby counties as a base for their legal work. This adaptation aims to enhance the efficacy of the judicial system by ensuring judges can manage their responsibilities in a manner that is both accessible and practical without incurring excessive travel costs.

Summary

House Bill 353 aims to authorize district court judges in Florida to establish an official headquarters in an adjacent county to their residence. This change is designed to facilitate judges who live more than 50 miles from the official district headquarters, allowing them to conduct court business more efficiently. Under this bill, judges are eligible to receive subsistence and travel reimbursements for their duties in these alternative locations, which is intended to alleviate the logistical burdens faced by judges whose primary courts are located far from their homes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding House Bill 353 appears largely positive, particularly among legislators focused on judicial efficiency. Supporters argue that providing alternative headquarters will lead to smoother court operations and ease the burden on judges who otherwise face long commutes. This bill represents a proactive step in improving the judicial process and accommodating the realities of a diverse state where geographical challenges can impact legal proceedings.

Contention

While the overall response to HB 353 has been favorable, some concerns may arise regarding the implications of additional funding required for travel reimbursements and subsistence. Critics could argue that extending these benefits might lead to increased state expenditures or potential abuses of the reimbursement system. Nonetheless, the bill seeks to balance the needs of the judicial system with fiscal responsibility by ensuring reimbursements are contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds.

Companion Bills

FL S0570

Same As Alternative Headquarters for District Court of Appeal Judges

Similar Bills

AZ SB1543

Ancillary use; international headquarters campus

FL H7027

The Judicial Branch

MD SJ5

Locating the New Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters in Maryland

MD HJ4

Locating the New Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters in Maryland

US SB22

Strategic Withdrawal of Agencies for Meaningful Placement Act or the SWAMP ActThis bill prohibits new construction, major renovation, leasing, or renewing a lease of certain executive agency headquarters in the District of Columbia metropolitan area and establishes a competitive bidding process for the relocation of such headquarters.The General Services Administration (GSA) must (1) establish a process to allow an executive agency to request the GSA to issue a solicitation for the relocation of its headquarters or allow the GSA to issue such a solicitation without a request, if necessary; (2) allow any state or political subdivision of a state to respond to a solicitation with a proposal for the relocation of the agency's headquarters; and (3) in consultation with the executive agency, select a state or political subdivision of a state for the relocation of the agency's headquarters using a competitive bidding procedure based on certain considerations.

US HB514

Strategic Withdrawal of Agencies for Meaningful Placement Act or the SWAMP ActThis bill prohibits new construction, major renovation, leasing, or renewing a lease of certain executive agency headquarters in the District of Columbia metropolitan area and establishes a competitive bidding process for the relocation of such headquarters.The General Services Administration (GSA) must (1) establish a process to allow an executive agency to request the GSA to issue a solicitation for the relocation of its headquarters or allow the GSA to issue such a solicitation without a request, if necessary; (2) allow any state or political subdivision of a state to respond to a solicitation with a proposal for the relocation of the agency's headquarters; and (3) in consultation with the executive agency, select a state or political subdivision of a state for the relocation of the agency's headquarters using a competitive bidding procedure based on certain considerations.

IL HB1188

CORPORATE GIVEAWAYS COMPACT