Florida 2024 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1551

Introduced
1/8/24  
Refer
1/13/24  
Introduced
1/8/24  
Refer
1/13/24  
Refer
1/13/24  
Refer
2/7/24  
Refer
1/13/24  
Engrossed
2/22/24  
Refer
2/7/24  
Refer
2/23/24  
Engrossed
2/22/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Refer
2/23/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Passed
3/22/24  
Enrolled
3/5/24  
Passed
3/22/24  

Caption

Florida State Guard

Impact

The implementation of HB 1551 is positioned to enhance the oversight and vetting of applicants for the Florida State Guard. By instituting fingerprinting and background checks, the legislation aims to improve public safety and ensure that individuals with potentially disqualifying criminal histories are not able to serve in this capacity. The financial responsibility for the fingerprint processing and retention falls on the Division of the State Guard, which aligns their interests with maintaining vigilant selection practices.

Summary

House Bill 1551 establishes a new statute, 251.002, requiring that all applicants for the Florida State Guard undergo a comprehensive criminal history record check. This involves submitting a complete set of fingerprints to the Division of the State Guard or an authorized entity, with these fingerprints being forwarded for both state and federal processing. The Department of Military Affairs is authorized to review the results of these checks and ascertain whether candidates meet the qualifications to serve in the State Guard.

Sentiment

The bill is likely to receive broad support from legislative members and communities who prioritize safety and security in the recruitment processes for the State Guard. This proactive approach to background checks reflects an understanding of the importance of ensuring qualified and trustworthy individuals are in positions of responsibility. However, some concerns may arise regarding privacy and the administrative burden of conducting such checks, particularly if they involve extensive processing times or costs.

Contention

While HB 1551 appears to enjoy general support, potential contention could arise from groups concerned about the repercussions of criminal background checks on potential applicants, especially regarding issues of privacy and fairness. The effectiveness of this measure will depend on its implementation and the transparency of the processes involved. Moreover, the requirement to report identified arrests could lead to scrutiny and debate over how these records are managed and disclosed within the State Guard framework.

Companion Bills

FL S1694

Similar To Florida State Guard

FL S7058

Similar To Criminal History Checks for the Florida State Guard

Similar Bills

MO SB636

Modifies provisions relating to background checks for certain applicants of agencies, boards, and commissions

CO HB1270

Change Term Name-based Criminal History Record Check

AZ HB2688

Qualified schools; fingerprinting requirements; penalties.

AZ SB1266

Qualified schools; fingerprinting requirements; penalties

AZ SB1136

Schools; noncertificated personnel; background investigations

CA AB3235

Fingerprint rollers and custodians of records.

LA HB604

Provides relative to expungement of records (RR1 INCREASE GF EX See Note)

CO SB146

Fingerprint-Based Criminal History Record Checks