Florida 2025 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1543

Introduced
2/28/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Refer
4/4/25  

Caption

Contracting with Foreign Countries of Concern

Impact

If passed, the bill will significantly impact how government contracts are negotiated and maintained within Florida. The prohibition against contracting with entities that have connections to these foreign countries could limit the pool of vendors available to governmental entities, especially in the technology sector where many devices and solutions are produced globally. By requiring affidavits and placing restrictions on who can bid on contracts, the bill aims to enhance data security and protect sensitive government operations from foreign influence or espionage.

Summary

House Bill 1543 seeks to regulate and prohibit governmental entities in Florida from entering into contracts with entities that have connections to specific foreign countries deemed as concerns. These countries include the People's Republic of China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Qatar, and Syria. The bill revises existing statutes to tighten the regulatory framework around the procurement process, mandating that any entity submitting a bid or proposal must sign an affidavit stating it does not meet criteria set forth that could pose risks to personal identifying information or national security.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1543 appears to be largely supportive among legislative committee discussions that emphasize national security and the protection of citizens' personal information. Supporters argue that the measures introduced by this bill are necessary to safeguard Florida's interests and that the risks posed by entities linked to foreign countries warrant strict regulatory oversight. However, concerns have been raised about the potential negative impact on competition and the possibility of limiting access to certain technologies or services that are crucial for government efficiency.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the balance between ensuring national security and maintaining a competitive marketplace for government contracts. Critics argue that the overly broad definitions of 'foreign countries of concern' could lead to discrimination against legitimate businesses that may inadvertently be affected, thereby reducing competition. Furthermore, the potential for legal challenges related to the enforcement of the affidavit requirements and the penalties for noncompliance, including civil penalties and contract disqualification for up to five years, remains a contentious issue within legislative discussions.

Companion Bills

FL S0768

Similar To Foreign Countries of Concern

FL H0977

Similar To Contracting with Foreign Countries of Concern

FL S1538

Similar To Contracting with Foreign Countries of Concern

Similar Bills

CA AB481

California Mental Health Planning Council: name change.

CA AB1317

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

CA AB839

Medi-Cal: targeted case management.

CA AB603

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

KS SB66

Substitute for SB 66 by Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics - Requiring annual filing of the statement of substantial interests by elected or appointed city or county officials, providing that officials of governmental subdivisions other than cities or counties file statements of substantial interests if any change in substantial interests occurred and requiring governmental officials with a substantial interest in a real estate development project to verbally disclose such interest prior to participating in any discussion, review or action on a proposed zoning change or permit.

KS SB86

Requiring local governmental officials to disclose substantial interests in the construction and operation of a wind or solar energy conversion system and to abstain from all local governmental actions relating to such matters.

FL H0977

Contracting with Foreign Countries of Concern

CA SB373

Public contracts: design-build: Stanislaus Regional Water Authority.