Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HB231

Introduced
2/2/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Introduced
2/2/23  
Engrossed
3/6/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Refer
3/7/23  
Engrossed
3/6/23  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/7/23  

Caption

Prosecuting Attorneys Oversight Commission; create

Impact

The implications of HB 231 are significant for criminal procedure in Georgia, as the bill seeks to integrate immigration status into the bail-setting process. Supporters argue that involving immigration considerations will enhance public safety by ensuring that those who might pose a flight risk due to their immigration circumstances are adequately assessed when being granted bail. The legislation further formalizes the role of law enforcement in verifying immigration status, which may have broader repercussions for individuals detained on other charges.

Summary

House Bill 231 introduces amendments to the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, focusing on the procedures surrounding bail hearings in the context of lawful presence in the United States. The bill mandates that courts must consider the accused's immigration status in their judgments regarding bail, ensuring that this factor is explicitly evaluated on the record. It also requires sheriffs and deputies to honor immigration detainer requests, which can extend custody of an individual for up to 48 hours to enable federal immigration authorities to take over if necessary.

Sentiment

Public and political sentiment regarding HB 231 appears mixed and polarized. Proponents, particularly from law enforcement and certain political factions, view the bill as a necessary step toward enhancing public safety and ensuring compliance with immigration law. Conversely, critics argue that the bill may criminalize individuals based on their immigration status and could foster distrust between immigrant communities and law enforcement agencies. This division reflects wider national debates on immigration policy and criminal justice reform.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from concerns that the bill could disproportionately affect undocumented individuals and further complicate the relationship between local law enforcement and immigrant communities. Critics have expressed fears that the enforcement of immigration detainers could lead to increased racial profiling and civil rights violations. Additionally, the bill’s implementation could shift law enforcement's focus away from community policing towards compliance with federal immigration laws, raising broader ethical and social questions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.