Georgia Senate Bill SB23

Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/23
• Refer: 1/26/23
• Report Pass: 2/7/23
• Engrossed: 2/9/23
• Report Pass: 2/23/23
• Enrolled: 4/5/23
• Vetoed: 5/5/23

Caption

O.C.G.A.; various titles; revise a committee name; relating to inactive boards, panels, authorities, centers, commissions, committees, councils, task forces, and other such bodies; provisions; repeal

Impact

The passage of SB 23 will have significant ramifications on the administration and operation of executive state agencies. By consolidating data sharing protocols and offering a clear avenue for resolving inter-agency disputes, the GDAC aims to streamline government functions and improve accountability. This legislation repeals several outdated or inactive boards and commissions, indicating a shift towards a more agile and efficient governmental structure. Furthermore, these revisions are expected to foster a more collaborative environment among various state departments through improved data utilization.

Summary

Senate Bill 23 is a legislative measure aimed at revising various titles within the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. It includes provisions for correcting committee names, repealing inactive boards and commissions, and updating procedures for data sharing among state agencies through the establishment of the Georgia Data Analytic Center (GDAC). The GDAC is defined as an agent of all executive state agencies to facilitate data sharing and resolve disputes regarding such data, enhancing efficiency and oversight in state operations.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards SB 23 appears constructive, particularly among proponents who advocate for greater efficiency in state governance and enhanced transparency in data handling. Supporters argue that the GDAC will establish a solid framework for data access while maintaining compliance with relevant laws. However, there may be concerns regarding the protection of sensitive information during these data sharing processes. The debate could reflect a broader discussion on balancing transparency with confidentiality in governmental operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the bill's attempts to centralize data management and sharing, which some critics may view as a potential overreach, jeopardizing individual agencies' discretion in handling their data. Furthermore, the changes to the legislative committees and the repeal of inactive bodies could elicit pushback from stakeholders who are invested in specific local boards and commissions. The fear of reduced local representation in favor of a more centralized approach to state governance may be a key area of debate as the bill moves forward.