Hawaii House Bill HB1803

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/22
• Refer: 1/26/22
• Report Pass: 2/10/22
• Refer: 2/10/22

Caption

Proposing An Amendment To Article I Of The Constitution Of The State Of Hawaii To Recognize And Protect The Inherent And Inalienable Right Of All People To Clean Water And Air And Healthy Ecosystems, Including Climate, And To The Preservation Of The Natural, Cultural, Scenic, And Healthful Qualities Of The Environment.

Impact

If enacted, HB1803 would fundamentally alter the state's approach to environmental protection by enshrining these rights in the Constitution. This could lead to stronger legal grounding for environmental advocacy, potentially affecting a wide array of policies related to water and air quality, land use, and ecosystem management. The amendment aims to ensure that protections for the environment are not only current but also preserved for future generations, reflecting a commitment to sustainability.

Summary

House Bill 1803 proposes a constitutional amendment to the State of Hawaii's Constitution, specifically Article I, to recognize the inherent and inalienable rights of all individuals to clean water, clean air, and a healthy environment. This includes a commitment to preserving Hawaii's natural, cultural, scenic, and healthful qualities of the environment for present and future generations. The bill is rooted in both environmental concerns and the cultural traditions of Native Hawaiians, emphasizing their unique relationship with the land and environment, known as āina.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB1803 has been predominantly positive among environmental groups and advocates who view it as a crucial step toward safeguarding Hawaii's unique ecosystems and culture. However, there are also concerns regarding the practical implications of the amendment, particularly related to enforcement and the balance between development and conservation. Proponents argue that this bill represents an essential acknowledgment of environmental rights, while critics may fear it could impose restrictions on development and land use that could impact local economies.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the potential implications for existing property rights and development projects. Critics of the bill might argue that it could hinder economic activities or impose unreasonable burdens on businesses. The discussions and debates surrounding the bill will likely require careful consideration of how to balance ecological preservation with economic growth, with stakeholders from various perspectives needing to engage constructively to find common ground on these critical issues.