Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2642

Introduced
1/21/22  
Refer
1/24/22  
Report Pass
3/3/22  
Engrossed
3/8/22  

Caption

Relating To Family.

Impact

If enacted, SB2642 would reshape how paternity and divorce proceedings involving allegations of domestic abuse are handled in Hawaii. By formalizing an exemption from mediation in such cases, the bill aims to prioritize the safety and autonomy of victims of domestic abuse. It also mandates that mediators must screen for domestic abuse before proceeding and lays out specific protocols to follow when allegations are present. This change may lead to fewer cases forcing victims into uncomfortable or potentially dangerous mediation scenarios, and could also shift some procedural dynamics within family law in Hawaii.

Summary

Senate Bill 2642 seeks to address concerns surrounding domestic abuse in the contexts of paternity and divorce proceedings. The bill introduces significant exemptions from mandatory mediation in cases where there are allegations of domestic abuse. The primary thrust of the bill is to ensure that individuals alleging domestic abuse are not compelled to participate in mediation proceedings, thereby safeguarding their interests and wellbeing. Under the proposed amendments, courts would be restricted from mandating mediation if there is a temporary restraining order or protective order in force, unless certain conditions are met to ensure the safety of the victim.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB2642 appears to be largely positive among advocacy groups focused on domestic violence and survivor rights. Proponents argue that the bill is a crucial step in protecting those who have experienced abuse from further victimization through mandated mediation processes. However, there may be contention among legal professionals regarding the mandate that mediators must be specially trained in domestic abuse, as this could require additional training and resources that may not be readily available within all mediation contexts.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB2642 include concerns from some legal professionals who may question the implementation of specialized mediation requirements. Additionally, there are potential implications for how courts will manage cases that involve unclear allegations of domestic abuse, especially in situations where a restraining order is not in effect. The balance between protecting victims’ rights and ensuring fair legal processes for all parties involved is a complex issue that could lead to further discussions in the legal community.

Companion Bills

HI HB2211

Same As Relating To Family.

Previously Filed As

HI HB2211

Relating To Family.

HI HB1283

Relating To Family.

HI SB1520

Relating To Family.

HI HB618

Relating To Family.

HI SB984

Relating To Family.

HI HB618

Relating To Family.

HI SB984

Relating To Family.

HI SB472

Relating To Family Court.

Similar Bills

HI HB618

Relating To Family.

HI SB984

Relating To Family.

HI SB984

Relating To Family.

HI HB618

Relating To Family.

HI HR51

Requesting The Judiciary To Convene A Working Group To Study How Effective Existing Laws On Domestic Violence Temporary Restraining Orders, Protective Orders, And Harassment By Stalking Are In Preventing Continued Abuse And Harassment.

HI HCR55

Requesting The Judiciary To Convene A Working Group To Study How Effective Existing Laws On Domestic Violence Temporary Restraining Orders, Protective Orders, And Harassment By Stalking Are In Preventing Continued Abuse And Harassment.

CA AB1396

Protective orders: elder and dependent adults.

CA AB611

Safe at Home program: homeowners’ associations.