Hawaii Senate Bill SB665

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/21
• Refer: 1/27/21
• Report Pass: 2/3/22
• Engrossed: 2/7/22
• Refer: 3/10/22
• Report Pass: 3/24/22
• Refer: 3/24/22
• Report Pass: 4/8/22
• Report Pass: 4/28/22
• Enrolled: 5/3/22
• Chaptered: 6/27/22
• Passed: 6/27/22

Caption

Relating To Violations Of Campaign Finance Law.

Impact

The modifications to Sections 11-410, 11-411, and 11-412 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes introduce significant changes in how campaign finance violations are treated. Notably, the bill grants the Attorney General or local prosecuting attorneys the authority to initiate criminal prosecutions in addition to administrative measures. Furthermore, it increases the duration of disqualification from holding elective office from four to ten years for those convicted under the new provisions. This is expected to create a stricter environment around campaign financing and advertising compliance.

Summary

SB665, also known as the bill regarding violations of campaign finance law, aims to strengthen the enforcement of campaign finance regulations in Hawaii. The legislation amends existing statutes to impose more severe penalties for violations, specifically targeting those who provide false information related to campaign advertisements. By reclassifying the act of intentionally providing false addresses or names as a class C felony, the bill seeks to deter fraudulent activities in campaign finance, thereby enhancing integrity in political processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB665 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers who prioritize electoral integrity and ethical campaigning. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to ensure transparency and accountability in campaign financing. However, there is a potential contention as critics may view the increased penalties and expanded prosecutorial powers as an overreach, raising concerns about the implications for civil rights and political expression.

Contention

Notable points of contention center on the balance between enforcing stringent campaign finance laws and protecting political speech. The fear among some lawmakers and advocacy groups is that harsh penalties might inadvertently lead to chilling effects on campaign activities. The debate around SB665 highlights the ongoing tension between regulatory measures intended to safeguard democracy and the fundamental rights of individuals to freely engage in political processes.