Relating To Historic Preservation Reviews.
One significant impact of SB 1354, if enacted, would be the delegation of historic preservation reviews to the DHHL for lands under its jurisdiction, thereby providing a streamlined process for project evaluations while ensuring that heritage considerations are integrated. The bill mandates that DHHL designates a qualified preservation officer to oversee these reviews and that all findings and related documentation are made accessible through a digital management system. While maintaining some authority for the Department of Land and Natural Resources for certain listings and districts, it grants the DHHL both operational capacity and responsibility in protecting historically significant sites.
Senate Bill 1354 aims to enhance the state's approach to historic preservation reviews by authorizing the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) to take the lead in evaluating the effects of proposed projects on historic properties and burial sites within its jurisdiction. This bill seeks to amend the existing Section 6E-8 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, enhancing the capacity of DHHL in handling its responsibilities regarding projects related to lands it manages. It seeks to bolster the protection and management of Hawaii's historic and culturally significant sites, particularly those that are vital to Native Hawaiian heritage.
The sentiment surrounding SB 1354 appears to be largely positive, especially among supporters who see this as a step towards greater recognition and empowerment of the DHHL in preserving the cultural integrity of Hawaiian lands. Advocates argue that allowing DHHL to lead the consultation process will enhance the focus on projects that impact Native Hawaiian heritage and facilitate more relevant and culturally sensitive management of historic sites. However, some concerns could be raised regarding the adequacy of resources and expertise available to DHHL to effectively carry out these responsibilities.
Potential points of contention may arise regarding the effectiveness of DHHL in managing the reviews, particularly in ensuring that the expertise required for historic preservation is adequately met. Opponents may argue that existing structures should not be altered lest it complicate the evaluation process or diminish the oversight role of other state departments, such as the Department of Land and Natural Resources. The bill's emphasis on administrative responsibilities and digital transparency will be critical in addressing these concerns.