Hawaii House Bill HCR207

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/14/25
• Report Pass: 3/27/25
• Refer: 3/27/25

Caption

Urging The Department Of Land And Natural Resources To Conduct A Comprehensive Economic Analysis Of All Military-leased Lands.

Impact

The resolution points out that the existing lease agreements have failed to account for the full economic and environmental repercussions of military land usage. It calls for an analysis that will cover lost economic opportunities related to agriculture, education, and housing that could benefit Native Hawaiians and other citizens of Hawaii. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need to assess the costs required for clean-up and restoration of these lands which have suffered from military operations, including pollution and structural damage.

Summary

H.C.R. NO. 207 is a House Concurrent Resolution introduced in the State of Hawaii urging the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to conduct a comprehensive economic analysis of all military-leased lands. This bill recognizes the significant number of military installations that currently occupy over two hundred thousand acres of the public land trust in Hawaii, which is primarily aimed at addressing both the economic and environmental concerns tied to these leases. The resolution highlights the expiration of several military land leases in 2029, which provides a critical timeframe to reassess the terms and impacts of these agreements.

Contention

A significant contention arises from the need for a formal public process in future lease negotiations. The bill urges that community consultations and public hearings be included, giving a voice to all stakeholders affected by these military land leases. Some critics may argue that the resolution could complicate negotiations or create delays; however, supporters believe that such transparency is essential for ensuring that Native Hawaiian rights and public interests are adequately represented. The request for a report detailing the findings and plans for future lease negotiations adds a layer of accountability to the process, reflecting an increased demand for local governance in matters traditionally handled at the federal level.