A joint resolution calling for an Article V convention in order to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the number of terms that a person may serve in Congress.(Formerly HJR 4.)
The application for a constitutional convention under Article V represents a significant shift in the approach to governance, as it empowers states to initiate amendments independently. If adopted, HJR7 would necessitate an active role for states in shaping constitutional law, especially concerning fiscal responsibility and federal authority. The resolution also establishes a continuing application, meaning it will remain valid until a specified threshold of states applies for a similar convention or until the Iowa General Assembly withdraws the application.
House Joint Resolution 7 (HJR7) is a legislative proposal seeking to call for an Article V convention aimed at proposing amendments to the United States Constitution. The resolution specifically emphasizes the imposition of fiscal restraints on the federal government, limits on the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and restrictions on the number of terms that federal officials and Congress members may serve. This initiative echoes concerns among state legislators regarding federal overreach and the growing national debt.
Notable points of contention surrounding HJR7 include concerns about the potential for a runaway convention where unintended amendments could be proposed, leading to significant changes in the Constitution. Critics worry that while the intentions of limiting federal power and addressing fiscal discipline are well-meaning, the risks of opening up the entire Constitution for revision could outweigh the benefits. Advocates, on the other hand, argue that the current federal practices have increasingly encroached upon states' rights, thus necessitating this measure as a check on federal authority.