A bill for an act relating to the use of certain technology, including the legal effect of the use of distributed ledger technology or smart contracts and affirmative defenses associated with the use of cybersecurity programs.(See HF 553.)
A central feature of HSB154 is its provision for creating an affirmative defense for entities employing comprehensive cybersecurity programs. The bill mandates that these programs must adhere to recognized industry standards for the protection of personal and restricted information. If a covered entity's cybersecurity practices align with these standards, it can claim this affirmative defense against lawsuits alleging negligence related to data breaches. This approach aims to incentivize businesses to enhance their cybersecurity measures while providing a legal safeguard for those that demonstrate due diligence in protecting sensitive information.
House Study Bill 154 (HSB154) addresses the intersection of state law with emerging technologies, specifically focusing on distributed ledger technology (DLT) and smart contracts. The bill seeks to establish that records, signatures, and contracts created or stored through DLT or smart contracts retain their legal effect. This provision is intended to clarify the legal standing of digital records and agreements in the context of state law, encouraging the adoption of these technologies within Iowa's legal framework. Additionally, the bill assures that ownership rights associated with data secured using DLT remain with the original owner unless explicitly stated otherwise in a transaction.
The introduction of HSB154 is expected to spark discussions regarding the adequacy of existing data protection laws in the face of evolving technological landscapes. Proponents of the bill argue that it promotes innovation and technological integration within the business landscape of Iowa, positioning the state as a forward-thinking entity that embraces digital advancements. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the potential weakening of accountability standards for businesses, particularly those handling sensitive personal information. The absence of a private right of action could limit recourse for individuals adversely affected by data breaches, raising important questions about consumer protections in the digital age.